Removal of oxyfluorfen from spiked soils using electrokinetic fences
In this work, an accidental spill of Fluoxyl (commercial herbicide containing oxyfluorfen) is simulated in a pilot plant with a soil volume of 70 × 50 × 50 cm3. The transport of Fluoxyl obtained by the free diffusion of pollution and under the application of the electrokinetic fences (EKF) technolog...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/11852 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.050 http://hdl.handle.net/10578/11852 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Oxyfluorfen Herbicide Electroremediation Natural soil Electrokinetic fence Pilot plant |
| Sumario: | In this work, an accidental spill of Fluoxyl (commercial herbicide containing oxyfluorfen) is simulated in a pilot plant with a soil volume of 70 × 50 × 50 cm3. The transport of Fluoxyl obtained by the free diffusion of pollution and under the application of the electrokinetic fences (EKF) technology are compared in a 34-day treatment. In addition, the temperature, conductivity, and pH are monitored daily. At the end of the experiment, a post-mortem analysis is carried out in order to obtain a 3-D distribution map of the pollutant. The results show that EKF is a good technology to remove oxyfluorfen from the soil without excavation because it is able to attain a fast transfer of oxyfluorfen to the flushing fluid used. After 34 days, the decrease in the concentration of oxyfluofen in the simulated case without any treatment is only 5.5%, whereas when EKF is applied, the removal yield is approximately 63% (60.7% of improvement vs. natural volatilization). Detailed analyses of the experimental data, the 3-D map, and recent literature suggest that the main mechanism involved for the removal is the rapid transfer of oxyfluorfen to the flushing fluid used. The results are also discussed in the context of a previous work in which the same technology has been applied for the removal of the ionic herbicide 2,4-D. A comparison allows sound conclusions to be made for future scale-up studies |
|---|