Hardware support for contention tracking in CPU and GPU last-level cache
Modern MPSoCs increasingly rely on resource utilization to improve application performance with different computation needs. The last-level cache (LLC) is one of the main shared resources, contributing to the improvement of aggregated performance. However, LLC sharing also increases individual appli...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/443379 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/443379 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103591 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Last level cache Resource sharing Contention Monitoring Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Arquitectura de computadors Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Hardware |
| Sumario: | Modern MPSoCs increasingly rely on resource utilization to improve application performance with different computation needs. The last-level cache (LLC) is one of the main shared resources, contributing to the improvement of aggregated performance. However, LLC sharing also increases individual application performance variability, which is undesirable in scenarios where performance guarantees are required. While deploying cache partitioning mechanisms allows regaining predictability, they negatively affect aggregated performance. This confronts system designers with the dire conundrum of choosing between aggregated performance and predictability. We contend that adding hardware support to track contention among tasks (kernels) in the LLC enables it to be shared, removing shortcomings brought by partitioning while providing a clear view of how tasks (kernels) affect each other in the LLC of the CPUs and GPUs. This approach enables achieving the desired balance between performance and predictability. Thus, we propose a low-overhead hardware mechanism, called demotion counters (DC), that tightly estimates the contention tasks (kernels) generate on each other in the shared LLC, outperforming other solutions that build on existing hardware contention-tracking proposals which suffer an average workload breakdown deviation (wbd) over 0.13. Our results also show that DC introduces 0.66% area overhead. |
|---|