Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville

[Objectives]: To describe the characteristics and clinical differences between institutionalised patients and those included in a home care program. [Design]: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and multicentre study. Site Seville, 2016. [Study subjects]: A total 1857 elderly patients of...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Huesa Andrade, Macarena, Calvo-Gallego, José Luis, Pedregal González, Miguel Ángel, Bohórquez Colombo, Pilar
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2020
País:España
Recursos:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositório:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/237529
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/237529
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Institutionalization
Aged
Chronic diseases
Home nursing
Dependency
Institucionalización
Ancianos
Enfermedad crónica
Atención domiciliaria
Dependencia
id ES_574dc1dadabdf0cc95fb02622f09e86e
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/237529
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
Diferencias entre pacientes institucionalizados y pacientes en atención domiciliaria en la provincia de Sevilla
title Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
spellingShingle Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
Huesa Andrade, Macarena
Institutionalization
Aged
Chronic diseases
Home nursing
Dependency
Institucionalización
Ancianos
Enfermedad crónica
Atención domiciliaria
Dependencia
title_short Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
title_full Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
title_fullStr Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
title_full_unstemmed Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
title_sort Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in Seville
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huesa Andrade, Macarena
Calvo-Gallego, José Luis
Pedregal González, Miguel Ángel
Bohórquez Colombo, Pilar
author Huesa Andrade, Macarena
author_facet Huesa Andrade, Macarena
Calvo-Gallego, José Luis
Pedregal González, Miguel Ángel
Bohórquez Colombo, Pilar
author_role author
author2 Calvo-Gallego, José Luis
Pedregal González, Miguel Ángel
Bohórquez Colombo, Pilar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Andaluza de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Institutionalization
Aged
Chronic diseases
Home nursing
Dependency
Institucionalización
Ancianos
Enfermedad crónica
Atención domiciliaria
Dependencia
topic Institutionalization
Aged
Chronic diseases
Home nursing
Dependency
Institucionalización
Ancianos
Enfermedad crónica
Atención domiciliaria
Dependencia
description [Objectives]: To describe the characteristics and clinical differences between institutionalised patients and those included in a home care program. [Design]: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and multicentre study. Site Seville, 2016. [Study subjects]: A total 1857 elderly patients of similar characteristics (1441 institutionalised and 416 at home) in Seville in 2016. [Measurements]: The variables studied included gender, age, civil status, family support, pathologies, multiple pathology criteria, and medication prescriptions. Functional and cognitive status was evaluated using the Barthel index, and the Lawton-Brody and Pfeiffer scales. [Results]: The majority of patients (71.40%) were women. The fact of being institutionalised or being included in a home care program were statistically related to the following pathologies and categories: schizophrenia (p < .001), arterial hypertension (p = .012), diabetes mellitus (p = .001), atrial fibrillation (p < .001), and neoplasia (p = .012), A1 (p = .012), A2 (p < .001), B1 (p < .001), B2 (p = .002), C (p < .001), E1 (p < .001), E3 (p = .01), F2 (p < .01), G2 (p = .024), and H (p = .005). The mean Barthel index of the sample was 49.1 ± 34.45 (95% confidence interval: 47.49-50.7). The mean Lawton-Brody scale in the case of patients included the home care program was 2.33 ± 2.49 and in those institutionalised 1.59 ± 2.12. The mean Pfeiffer scale was 4.93 ± 3.53. [Conclusions]: Cognitive impairment was related to institutionalisation, being a result of possible neurological (E3 category) and psychiatric diseases. On the other hand, patient comorbidity was not related to it, because it is very high in patients included in a home care program, in whom functional and cognitive independency status is better.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2021
2021
2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/237529
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/237529
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2019.10.002

dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869408441806618624
spelling Differences between institutionalized patients and those included in a home care program in SevilleDiferencias entre pacientes institucionalizados y pacientes en atención domiciliaria en la provincia de SevillaHuesa Andrade, MacarenaCalvo-Gallego, José LuisPedregal González, Miguel ÁngelBohórquez Colombo, PilarInstitutionalizationAgedChronic diseasesHome nursingDependencyInstitucionalizaciónAncianosEnfermedad crónicaAtención domiciliariaDependencia[Objectives]: To describe the characteristics and clinical differences between institutionalised patients and those included in a home care program. [Design]: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and multicentre study. Site Seville, 2016. [Study subjects]: A total 1857 elderly patients of similar characteristics (1441 institutionalised and 416 at home) in Seville in 2016. [Measurements]: The variables studied included gender, age, civil status, family support, pathologies, multiple pathology criteria, and medication prescriptions. Functional and cognitive status was evaluated using the Barthel index, and the Lawton-Brody and Pfeiffer scales. [Results]: The majority of patients (71.40%) were women. The fact of being institutionalised or being included in a home care program were statistically related to the following pathologies and categories: schizophrenia (p < .001), arterial hypertension (p = .012), diabetes mellitus (p = .001), atrial fibrillation (p < .001), and neoplasia (p = .012), A1 (p = .012), A2 (p < .001), B1 (p < .001), B2 (p = .002), C (p < .001), E1 (p < .001), E3 (p = .01), F2 (p < .01), G2 (p = .024), and H (p = .005). The mean Barthel index of the sample was 49.1 ± 34.45 (95% confidence interval: 47.49-50.7). The mean Lawton-Brody scale in the case of patients included the home care program was 2.33 ± 2.49 and in those institutionalised 1.59 ± 2.12. The mean Pfeiffer scale was 4.93 ± 3.53. [Conclusions]: Cognitive impairment was related to institutionalisation, being a result of possible neurological (E3 category) and psychiatric diseases. On the other hand, patient comorbidity was not related to it, because it is very high in patients included in a home care program, in whom functional and cognitive independency status is better.[ES]: [Objetivo]: Conocer las características y las diferencias clínicas entre pacientes institucionalizados y los de programas de atención domiciliaria. [Diseño]: Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal multicéntrico. Emplazamiento Sevilla, 2016. [Participantes] Un total de 1.857 pacientes ancianos (1.441 institucionalizados y 416 en domicilio). [Mediciones]: Las variables estudiadas fueron: sexo, edad, estado civil, apoyo familiar, patologías, criterios de pluripatología y fármacos. Se valoraron el estado funcional y el cognitivo mediante las escalas de Barthel, Lawton-Brody y Pfeiffer. [Resultados]: Un 71,40% fueron mujeres. Estadísticamente el hecho de estar institucionalizados o vivir en el domicilio se relaciona con las siguientes patologías y categorías: esquizofrenia (p < 0,001), HTA (p = 0,012), DM (p = 0,001), FA (p< 0,001) y neoplasias (p = 0, 012), A1 (p = 0,012), A2 (p < 0,001), B1 (p < 0,001), B2 (p = 0,002), C (p < 0,001), E1 (p < 0,001), E3 (p = 0,01), F2 (p < 0,01), G2 (p = 0,024) y H (p = 0,005). El promedio del índice de Barthel de la muestra fue de 49,1 ± 34,45 (IC 95%: 47,49-50,7), el de Lawton-Brody en domicilio fue de 2,33 ± 2,49 y en institucionalizados, de 1,59 ± 2,12. La media de la escala de Pfeiffer fue de 4,93 ± 3,53. [Conclusiones]: Se asocia con la institucionalización el deterioro cognitivo, consecuencia de posibles patologías neurológicas (categoría E3) y psiquiátricas. Por el contrario, no se asocia con la comorbilidad del paciente, puesto que es muy elevada en pacientes en situación de atención domiciliaria con mejores estados de independencia funcional y cognitivo.Sociedad Andaluza de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria a través de la Beca Samfyc Isabel Fernández.ElsevierSociedad Andaluza de Medicina Familiar y ComunitariaConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2021202120202021info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/237529reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2019.10.002Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/2375292026-05-22T06:33:51Z
score 15,812429