Fluid–structure interaction simulations outperform computational fluid dynamics in the description of thoracic aorta haemodynamics and in the differentiation of progressive dilation in Marfan syndrome patients

Abnormal fluid dynamics at the ascending aorta may be at the origin of aortic aneurysms. This study was aimed at comparing the performance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulations against four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pons, Ramón, Cajas, Juan Carlos, Rodríguez-Palomares, José F., Guala, Andrea, Dux-Santoy, Lydia, Teixidó-Tura, Gisela, Molins, José Javier, Vázquez, Mariano|||0000-0002-2526-6708, Evangelista, Arturo, Martorell, Jordi
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/186709
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/186709
https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191752
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Magnetic resonance imaging
Computational fluid dynamics
Marfan syndrome
Fluid-structure interaction
Aneurysms
Ascending aorta
Aneurysm
Computational fluid dynamic
Fluid–structure interaction
Shear stress rati
Imatges per ressonància magnètica
Dinàmica de fluids computacional
Aneurismes
Eight Marfan syndrome
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la salut::Medicina
Descripción
Sumario:Abnormal fluid dynamics at the ascending aorta may be at the origin of aortic aneurysms. This study was aimed at comparing the performance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulations against four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data; and to assess the capacity of advanced fluid dynamics markers to stratify aneurysm progression risk. Eight Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, four with stable and four with dilating aneurysms of the proximal aorta, and four healthy controls were studied. FSI and CFD simulations were performed with MRI-derived geometry, inlet velocity field and Young's modulus. Flow displacement, jet angle and maximum velocity evaluated from FSI and CFD simulations were compared to 4D flow MRI data. A dimensionless parameter, the shear stress ratio (SSR), was evaluated from FSI and CFD simulations and assessed as potential correlate of aneurysm progression. FSI simulations successfully matched MRI data regarding descending to ascending aorta flow rates (R2 = 0.92) and pulse wave velocity (R2 = 0.99). Compared to CFD, FSI simulations showed significantly lower percentage errors in ascending and descending aorta in flow displacement (−46% ascending, −41% descending), jet angle (−28% ascending, −50% descending) and maximum velocity (−37% ascending, −34% descending) with respect to 4D flow MRI. FSI- but not CFD-derived SSR differentiated between stable and dilating MFS patients. Fluid dynamic simulations of the thoracic aorta require fluid–solid interaction to properly reproduce complex haemodynamics. FSI- but not CFD-derived SSR could help stratifying MFS patients.