Extended momentum model for assessing strut aerodynamic losses in vertical axis wind turbines

Vertical axis wind turbines offer significant potential for urban and offshore energy, yet parasitic drag from supporting struts frequently compromises their aerodynamic efficiency. Existing strut design tools are limited, leaving a gap between simplified analytical models and computationally expens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Suárez Fernández, Laura, Santamaría Bertolín, Luis|||0000-0001-8028-3837, Argüelles Díaz, Katia María, Fernández Oro, Jesús Manuel
Format: article
Publication Date:2026
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
Repository:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:ruo_________::4e6c5247e901d933e138beaf0d5df71f
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10651/84105
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2026.121232
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Aerodynamic performance
DMST model
Parasitic losses
Strut design
Urban wind energy
Vertical axis wind turbine
Description
Summary:Vertical axis wind turbines offer significant potential for urban and offshore energy, yet parasitic drag from supporting struts frequently compromises their aerodynamic efficiency. Existing strut design tools are limited, leaving a gap between simplified analytical models and computationally expensive fluid dynamics simulations. This study presents a rapid, reliable method for assessing these losses by extending the double-disk multiple streamtube (DMST) framework. The model analyzes three-dimensional realistic strut designs, integrating parasitic drag and blade-strut junction interference. Validated against computational fluid dynamic simulations, the approach was tested on an urban H-rotor turbine featuring hollow, ribbed, variable section struts with distinct airfoils. Quantitative analysis revealed that the root 30% of the strut contributes only 1% to total losses, and while the thin NACA0009 reduced the maximum power coefficient by a minimal 2.8%, the thick E863 strut caused a massive 50.3% reduction in performance, driven primarily by a 39.6% drop attributed solely to junction interference drag. While strut thickness is critical for small-scale efficiency, the relative impact of parasitic losses diminishes significantly as turbine scale and operating Reynolds numbers increase. Ultimately, the developed tool enables future research to address the full complexity of multidisciplinary strut design optimization.