Extending Slovene Independence: Global Contextualisation through local fieldwork

The chapter provides a reflection of the implications of the researchers breaking into the field in the changing political and social context of post- independence Slovenia. The reflection is presented in an evolutionary manner, beginning with the presentation of the initial research agenda, where t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: González Villa, Carlos Javier
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositorio:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/45029
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10578/45029
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Geopolitical change
Reconstruction
Slovene Independence
Social reproduction
Descripción
Sumario:The chapter provides a reflection of the implications of the researchers breaking into the field in the changing political and social context of post- independence Slovenia. The reflection is presented in an evolutionary manner, beginning with the presentation of the initial research agenda, where the independence of Slovenia was to be studied under the light of the EU enlargement discourse. The methodological plan involved the conduct of in-depth interviews with political elites that were to be analysed in a neo-positivist approach that took Slovenia as an instrumental case study. Recognition of the limits of that approach, fostered by the researchers experiences in the field, drove the reformulation of the research, which ended up portraying Slovenian independence as a means for social reproduction, equivalent to the Gramscian notion of passive revolution. The arrival at this point is depicted as the result of the extension of the case study in terms of Lai and Roccus formulation of the extended case methodology in International Relations, a bottom-up approach which departs from awareness of disturbances created by the researchers arrival in the field and postpones theoretical considerations to the final stage of the process.