Biodose Tools updates for criticality accidents and interlaboratory comparisons

Purpose: Since its initial release, the aim of Biodose Tools was to offer an easy-to-use platform to perform the mathematical calculations needed in biological dosimetry. This update 3.7.1, mainly focuses on new features related to large-scale emergency responses, like criticality accidents dose est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Francès-Abellán, Anna|||0000-0003-4738-1712, Endesfelder, David|||0009-0008-8942-8017, Hernández, Alfredo|||0000-0002-2660-4545, Armengol, Gemma|||0000-0003-2345-1106, Barquinero, Joan Francesc|||0000-0003-0084-5268
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:326056
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/326056
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1080/09553002.2026.2618524
Access Level:acceso embargado
Palabra clave:Biodose Tools update
Biodosimetry
Characteristic limits
Criticality accidents
Interlaboratory comparison
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: Since its initial release, the aim of Biodose Tools was to offer an easy-to-use platform to perform the mathematical calculations needed in biological dosimetry. This update 3.7.1, mainly focuses on new features related to large-scale emergency responses, like criticality accidents dose estimation and laboratory networks. Material and Methods: Biodose Tools has been developed using the R programming language. The current version (3.7.1) uses the same external dependencies as version 3.6.1 (released November 2022) while integrating three new external packages to support the new functionalities. Results: Version 3.7.1 introduces different new modules: (a) a characteristic limits module that calculates decision thresholds and detection limits following ISO19238:2023 standards, and offers statistical tests to compare rates between suspected exposure cases and control data; (b) an enhanced dose estimation module which supports multiple dose assessments for dicentric and translocation assays for various exposure scenarios: acute, protracted, and highly protracted, as well as whole and partial-body exposures; (c) a criticality accidents module for multiple dose estimations using dicentrics in mixed gamma-neutron exposure scenarios (e.g. nuclear detonations); and (d) an Interlaboratory comparison module that automates the evaluation and comparison of dose estimates across laboratories. Conclusions: Biodose Tools (https://www.reneb.net/software/) continues to evolve in response to the dynamic needs of the biological dosimetry community, contributing to the preparedness and consistency in emergency response and routine applications.