Subjetivación y sufrimiento en Theodor W. Adorno: Reflexiones "desde" la vida dañada
[EN] Autonomy is arguably the concept that best defines modern culture. The auto-nomous subject appears as the achievement and always unfinished project of modernity. What philosophical modernity calls subjectivity and the notions associated with it (autonomy, objective knowledge, self-consciousness...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262587 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/262587 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Subjectivity Suffering Experience Social domination Subjetividad Sufrimiento Experiencia Dominación social |
| Sumario: | [EN] Autonomy is arguably the concept that best defines modern culture. The auto-nomous subject appears as the achievement and always unfinished project of modernity. What philosophical modernity calls subjectivity and the notions associated with it (autonomy, objective knowledge, self-consciousness, freedom, moral will, etc.) cannot be thought of without taking into account the social relations that produce it, however much one may differentiate between genesis and validity. Th. W. Adorno is one of the thinkers who has delved most deeply into the significance of the experience of socially produced suffering in order to clarify the relation between the individual and society and to demystify the illusions of modern constitutive subjectivity. His work relates the question of truth, the critique of social domination, the questioning of morality and the formulation of a new ethical imperative, even the very possibility of art, to the experience of suffering. This contribution develops an analysis of the relation-ship between suffering, subjectivity and society with the help of Th. W. Ador-no’s contributions. |
|---|