Increased Peak Wall Stress, but Not Maximum Diameter, Is Associated with Symptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Objective: Maximum diameter (MD) is the established rupture predictor for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, biomechanical markers from finite element analysis (FEA) could be more accurate predictors for these patients. In this study, the association between peak wall stress (PWS) and MD with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Soto, B, Vila, L, Dilme, JF, Escudero, JR, Bellmunt, S, Camacho, M
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p5960
Acceso en línea:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=5960
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Morphological variables
Biomechanical variables
Finite element analysis
Symptomatic aneurysm
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: Maximum diameter (MD) is the established rupture predictor for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, biomechanical markers from finite element analysis (FEA) could be more accurate predictors for these patients. In this study, the association between peak wall stress (PWS) and MD with symptoms of AAA was evaluated. Methods: Patients diagnosed with infrarenal non-ruptured AAA at the centre between 2009 and 2015 were included. Clinical data, morphological variables (including MD), and the biomechanical variables PWS and diameter normalised PWS (dnPWS) in symptomatic (sAAA) and asymptomatic AAA patients (aAAA) were included. Results: A total of 170 patients were analysed, 153 aAAA and 17 sAAA. MD was significantly greater in sAAA patients than in aAAA patients (70.4 mm, 95% CI 66.4-86.0 vs. 59.1 mm, 95% CI 53.7-67.8, respectively; p = .002). PWS was also significantly higher in the sAAA group (324.6 kPa, 95% CI 217.4-399.5 vs. 199.2 kPa, 95% CI 165.6-239.5; p < .01). No differences in MD were found in patients with an AAA >= 65 mm (43 aAAA and 14 sAAA); however, both PWS (327.4 kPa, 95% CI 239.0-473.3 vs. 229.4 kPa, 95% CI 210.0 to 289.4; p = .020) and dnPWS (4.3, 95% CI 3.17-4.67 vs. 3.03, 95% CI 2.8-3.49; p = .004) were higher in sAAA than in aAAA. Conclusions: This study suggests that MD and the biomechanical parameters obtained by finite element analysis are greater in sAAA than in aAAA. However, considering patients with MD >= 65 mm alone, only PWS, and particularly dnPWS, were able to differentiate sAAA from aAAA. (C) 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.