Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees

Irrigation scheduling of fruit trees according to the water balance showed significant differences between locations. In recent years, water status measurements such as leaf water potential have been suggested as irrigation tools in different fruit trees. The aim of this study was to adjust water po...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Moriana Elvira, Alfonso, Pérez López, David, Prieto, María Henar, Pérez Rodríguez, Juan Manuel, Ramírez Santa Pau, Magdalena
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión enviada para evaluación y publicación
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/36648
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/11441/36648
https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.003
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Deficit irrigation
Olive oil
Plant water status
Water relations
id ES_20c5b1d6dfdeb4ee4660d3134bcc2be4
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/36648
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive treesIrrigation scheduling of olive orchard based on midday stem water potentialMoriana Elvira, AlfonsoPérez López, DavidPrieto, María HenarPérez Rodríguez, Juan ManuelRamírez Santa Pau, MagdalenaDeficit irrigationOlive oilPlant water statusWater relationsIrrigation scheduling of fruit trees according to the water balance showed significant differences between locations. In recent years, water status measurements such as leaf water potential have been suggested as irrigation tools in different fruit trees. The aim of this study was to adjust water potential threshold values previously studied and water application approaches that permit the estimation of irrigation requirements of olive trees based on midday stem water potential. The experiments were performed during three seasons (from 2005 to 2007) in two different locations (Badajoz and Ciudad Real) with different weather and cultural conditions. In both locations, the olive orchards were seven years old at the beginning of the experiment but had significantly different canopy development. In Ciudad Real the canopy shaded area at the beginning of the experiment was 15% and the first crop was harvested in 2003. On the other hand, the canopy shaded area of the olive orchard in the Badajoz experiment was 40% and the first crop was harvested in 2001. We therefore considered the Ciudad Real orchard as young and Badajoz as mature. Three different irrigation treatments were compared in both locations: Control treatment with traditional water balance as irrigation scheduling and two treatments in which midday stem water potential (SWP) provided the information about water management. In the midday stem water potential irrigation (WI) treatment the threshold value of SWP was −1.2 MPa before the beginning of the massive pit hardening period and −1.4 MPa after this date. Finally, in the deficit irrigation (DI) treatment the threshold value of SWP was −2.0 MPa throughout the season. In the WI and DI treatments irrigation was applied when SWP reached the threshold value. No significant differences were found between Control and WI in any of the seasons or locations when SWP, leaf conductance, shoot and fruit growth and yield (fruit and oil) were considered. In both locations, the same SWP value in WI treatment resulted in similar water application as the Control treatment. In DI treatment, shoot growth was significantly reduced in both locations in all the seasons. The SWP in DI trees was clearly affected in both locations, while leaf conductance was only reduced in the Badajoz experiment. In the Ciudad Real experiment no significant differences between DI and the other treatments were found in fruit growth, whereas differences were found in Badajoz. However, in Ciudad Real yield in DI treatment was significantly reduced, but not in Badajoz. WI treatment was successful for non-water-stress conditions. On the other hand, DI treatment was a mild water stress treatment which reduced yield only in low covered orchards, but not in the orchards with almost maximum canopy shaded area.Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones RTA04-046-C3ElsevierAgronomía2012info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11441/36648https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.003reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésAgricultural Water Management, 112, 43–54RTA04-046-C3http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377412001448info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/366482026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
Irrigation scheduling of olive orchard based on midday stem water potential
title Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
spellingShingle Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
Moriana Elvira, Alfonso
Deficit irrigation
Olive oil
Plant water status
Water relations
title_short Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
title_full Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
title_fullStr Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
title_full_unstemmed Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
title_sort Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Moriana Elvira, Alfonso
Pérez López, David
Prieto, María Henar
Pérez Rodríguez, Juan Manuel
Ramírez Santa Pau, Magdalena
author Moriana Elvira, Alfonso
author_facet Moriana Elvira, Alfonso
Pérez López, David
Prieto, María Henar
Pérez Rodríguez, Juan Manuel
Ramírez Santa Pau, Magdalena
author_role author
author2 Pérez López, David
Prieto, María Henar
Pérez Rodríguez, Juan Manuel
Ramírez Santa Pau, Magdalena
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Agronomía
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Deficit irrigation
Olive oil
Plant water status
Water relations
topic Deficit irrigation
Olive oil
Plant water status
Water relations
description Irrigation scheduling of fruit trees according to the water balance showed significant differences between locations. In recent years, water status measurements such as leaf water potential have been suggested as irrigation tools in different fruit trees. The aim of this study was to adjust water potential threshold values previously studied and water application approaches that permit the estimation of irrigation requirements of olive trees based on midday stem water potential. The experiments were performed during three seasons (from 2005 to 2007) in two different locations (Badajoz and Ciudad Real) with different weather and cultural conditions. In both locations, the olive orchards were seven years old at the beginning of the experiment but had significantly different canopy development. In Ciudad Real the canopy shaded area at the beginning of the experiment was 15% and the first crop was harvested in 2003. On the other hand, the canopy shaded area of the olive orchard in the Badajoz experiment was 40% and the first crop was harvested in 2001. We therefore considered the Ciudad Real orchard as young and Badajoz as mature. Three different irrigation treatments were compared in both locations: Control treatment with traditional water balance as irrigation scheduling and two treatments in which midday stem water potential (SWP) provided the information about water management. In the midday stem water potential irrigation (WI) treatment the threshold value of SWP was −1.2 MPa before the beginning of the massive pit hardening period and −1.4 MPa after this date. Finally, in the deficit irrigation (DI) treatment the threshold value of SWP was −2.0 MPa throughout the season. In the WI and DI treatments irrigation was applied when SWP reached the threshold value. No significant differences were found between Control and WI in any of the seasons or locations when SWP, leaf conductance, shoot and fruit growth and yield (fruit and oil) were considered. In both locations, the same SWP value in WI treatment resulted in similar water application as the Control treatment. In DI treatment, shoot growth was significantly reduced in both locations in all the seasons. The SWP in DI trees was clearly affected in both locations, while leaf conductance was only reduced in the Badajoz experiment. In the Ciudad Real experiment no significant differences between DI and the other treatments were found in fruit growth, whereas differences were found in Badajoz. However, in Ciudad Real yield in DI treatment was significantly reduced, but not in Badajoz. WI treatment was successful for non-water-stress conditions. On the other hand, DI treatment was a mild water stress treatment which reduced yield only in low covered orchards, but not in the orchards with almost maximum canopy shaded area.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
format article
status_str submittedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11441/36648
https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.003
url http://hdl.handle.net/11441/36648
https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.003
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Agricultural Water Management, 112, 43–54
RTA04-046-C3
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377412001448
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404478375985152
score 15,301603