PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis

Despite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised asses...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Gifford, George, Cullen, Alexis E., Vieira, Sandra, Searle, Anja, McCutcheon, Robert A., Modinos, Gemma, Stone, William S., Hird, Emily, Barnett, Jennifer, van Hell, Hendrika H., Catalán, Ana, Millgate, Edward, Taptiklis, Nick, Cormack, Francesca, Slot, Margot I. E., Dazzan, Paola, Maat, Arija, de Haan, Lieuwe, Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto, Glenthøj, Birte, Lawrie, Stephen M., McDonald, Colm, Gruber, Oliver, van Amelsvoort, Thérèse, Arango, Celso, Kircher, Tilo, Nelson, Barnaby, Galderisi, Silvana, Bressan, Rodrigo A., Kwon, Jun Soo, Weiser, Mark, Mizrahi, Romina, Sachs, Gabriele, Kirschner, Matthias, Reichenberg, Abraham, Kahn, René, McGuire, Philip
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/388325
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/388325
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Psychosis
Cognition
First episode psychosis
Clinical high risk for psychosis
id ES_1dcebb72ecbb5d78694950f22ad0ddda
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/388325
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosisGifford, GeorgeCullen, Alexis E.Vieira, SandraSearle, AnjaMcCutcheon, Robert A.Modinos, GemmaStone, William S.Hird, EmilyBarnett, Jennifervan Hell, Hendrika H.Catalán, AnaMillgate, EdwardTaptiklis, NickCormack, FrancescaSlot, Margot I. E.Dazzan, PaolaMaat, Arijade Haan, LieuweCrespo-Facorro, BenedictoGlenthøj, BirteLawrie, Stephen M.McDonald, ColmGruber, Olivervan Amelsvoort, ThérèseArango, CelsoKircher, TiloNelson, BarnabyGalderisi, SilvanaBressan, Rodrigo A.Kwon, Jun SooWeiser, MarkMizrahi, RominaSachs, GabrieleKirschner, MatthiasReichenberg, AbrahamKahn, RenéMcGuire, PhilipPsychosisCognitionFirst episode psychosisClinical high risk for psychosisDespite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised assessments could help to address this issue. We present data from an evaluation of PsyCog, a computerised, non-verbal, mini battery of cognitive tests. Healthy Control (HC) (N = 135), Clinical High Risk (CHR) (N = 233), and First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (N = 301) participants from a multi-centre prospective study were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. PsyCog was used to assess cognitive performance at baseline and at up to two follow-up timepoints. Mean total testing time was 35.95 min (SD = 2.87). Relative to HCs, effect sizes of performance impairments were medium to large in FEP patients (composite score G = 1.21, subtest range = 0.52–0.88) and small to medium in CHR patients (composite score G = 0.59, subtest range = 0.18–0.49). Site effects were minimal, and test-retest reliability of the PsyCog composite was good (ICC = 0.82–0.89), though some practice effects and differences in data completion between groups were found. The present implementation of PsyCog shows it to be a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in people with psychosis. Computerised cognitive assessments have the potential to facilitate the evaluation of cognition in psychosis in both research and in clinical care, though caution should still be taken in terms of implementation and study design.The PSYSCAN project is funded by the European Commission within its 7th Framework Programme under grant agreement number 603196: PSYSCAN – Translating neuroimaging findings from research into clinical practice. RAMs work is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development (224625/Z/21/Z)Peer reviewedElsevierEuropean CommissionWellcome TrustConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202520252024info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/388325reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/603196The underlying dataset has been published as supplementary material of the article in the publisher platform at DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2024.100310https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2024.100310Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3883252026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
title PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
spellingShingle PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
Gifford, George
Psychosis
Cognition
First episode psychosis
Clinical high risk for psychosis
title_short PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
title_full PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
title_fullStr PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
title_full_unstemmed PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
title_sort PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gifford, George
Cullen, Alexis E.
Vieira, Sandra
Searle, Anja
McCutcheon, Robert A.
Modinos, Gemma
Stone, William S.
Hird, Emily
Barnett, Jennifer
van Hell, Hendrika H.
Catalán, Ana
Millgate, Edward
Taptiklis, Nick
Cormack, Francesca
Slot, Margot I. E.
Dazzan, Paola
Maat, Arija
de Haan, Lieuwe
Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
Glenthøj, Birte
Lawrie, Stephen M.
McDonald, Colm
Gruber, Oliver
van Amelsvoort, Thérèse
Arango, Celso
Kircher, Tilo
Nelson, Barnaby
Galderisi, Silvana
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Kwon, Jun Soo
Weiser, Mark
Mizrahi, Romina
Sachs, Gabriele
Kirschner, Matthias
Reichenberg, Abraham
Kahn, René
McGuire, Philip
author Gifford, George
author_facet Gifford, George
Cullen, Alexis E.
Vieira, Sandra
Searle, Anja
McCutcheon, Robert A.
Modinos, Gemma
Stone, William S.
Hird, Emily
Barnett, Jennifer
van Hell, Hendrika H.
Catalán, Ana
Millgate, Edward
Taptiklis, Nick
Cormack, Francesca
Slot, Margot I. E.
Dazzan, Paola
Maat, Arija
de Haan, Lieuwe
Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
Glenthøj, Birte
Lawrie, Stephen M.
McDonald, Colm
Gruber, Oliver
van Amelsvoort, Thérèse
Arango, Celso
Kircher, Tilo
Nelson, Barnaby
Galderisi, Silvana
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Kwon, Jun Soo
Weiser, Mark
Mizrahi, Romina
Sachs, Gabriele
Kirschner, Matthias
Reichenberg, Abraham
Kahn, René
McGuire, Philip
author_role author
author2 Cullen, Alexis E.
Vieira, Sandra
Searle, Anja
McCutcheon, Robert A.
Modinos, Gemma
Stone, William S.
Hird, Emily
Barnett, Jennifer
van Hell, Hendrika H.
Catalán, Ana
Millgate, Edward
Taptiklis, Nick
Cormack, Francesca
Slot, Margot I. E.
Dazzan, Paola
Maat, Arija
de Haan, Lieuwe
Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
Glenthøj, Birte
Lawrie, Stephen M.
McDonald, Colm
Gruber, Oliver
van Amelsvoort, Thérèse
Arango, Celso
Kircher, Tilo
Nelson, Barnaby
Galderisi, Silvana
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Kwon, Jun Soo
Weiser, Mark
Mizrahi, Romina
Sachs, Gabriele
Kirschner, Matthias
Reichenberg, Abraham
Kahn, René
McGuire, Philip
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv European Commission
Wellcome Trust
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Psychosis
Cognition
First episode psychosis
Clinical high risk for psychosis
topic Psychosis
Cognition
First episode psychosis
Clinical high risk for psychosis
description Despite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised assessments could help to address this issue. We present data from an evaluation of PsyCog, a computerised, non-verbal, mini battery of cognitive tests. Healthy Control (HC) (N = 135), Clinical High Risk (CHR) (N = 233), and First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (N = 301) participants from a multi-centre prospective study were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. PsyCog was used to assess cognitive performance at baseline and at up to two follow-up timepoints. Mean total testing time was 35.95 min (SD = 2.87). Relative to HCs, effect sizes of performance impairments were medium to large in FEP patients (composite score G = 1.21, subtest range = 0.52–0.88) and small to medium in CHR patients (composite score G = 0.59, subtest range = 0.18–0.49). Site effects were minimal, and test-retest reliability of the PsyCog composite was good (ICC = 0.82–0.89), though some practice effects and differences in data completion between groups were found. The present implementation of PsyCog shows it to be a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in people with psychosis. Computerised cognitive assessments have the potential to facilitate the evaluation of cognition in psychosis in both research and in clinical care, though caution should still be taken in terms of implementation and study design.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/388325
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/388325
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/603196
The underlying dataset has been published as supplementary material of the article in the publisher platform at DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2024.100310
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2024.100310

dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404301291421696
score 15,812429