El método Delphi como herramienta de consenso en el diseño de un marco de aplicación de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación Médica en España
Introduction. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into biomedical education hascreated an urgent need for a framework that can guide both learners and academic staff. In Spain,where institutions are adopting AI at speed but without homogeneous regulatory or pedagogicalguidance, str...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Murcia |
| Repositorio: | DIGITUM. Depósito Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:digitum_____::73b19e37f3ae61920edb5b32cd9ade22 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.702541 http://hdl.handle.net/10201/225021 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Delphi Medical Education Inteligencia Artificial, Educación Médica España Artificial Intelligence No relacionado con ningún objetivo de desarrollo sostenible |
| Sumario: | Introduction. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into biomedical education hascreated an urgent need for a framework that can guide both learners and academic staff. In Spain,where institutions are adopting AI at speed but without homogeneous regulatory or pedagogicalguidance, structured approaches are required to prioritize competencies and address ethical, legaland educational challenges. Methods. A Delphi study was coordinated by the Universidad Europeade Madrid, using the REDCap platform to manage iterative rounds. The project received financialsupport from the Spanish Society for Medical Education (SEDEM). Experts in medical education,including some with specific AI expertise, participated in a sequence of online questionnaires.Through anonymized feedback, participants evaluated, refined and prioritized a core of areas wherethe impact of AI seems essential. Results. Experts agreed on the need for skills extending beyondtechnical literacy, emphasizing critical thinking, interpretation of AI-generated outputs, biasawareness and professional responsibility. Ethical and legal considerations, particularly concerningprivacy, transparency and decision-making, were strongly prioritized. Participants also highlightedthe transversal nature of AI, suggesting that competencies should be embedded across curricularather than treated as isolated content. Discussion. Despite institutional heterogeneity, consensusconverged on areas that balance innovation with ethical safeguards. The results support thedevelopment of a competency-based framework capable of guiding curriculum design, informingfaculty development and promoting responsible, evidence-informed use of AI while safeguardingprofessional autonomy |
|---|