Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts

Land use changes are among the primary drivers of declining biodiversity. To reverse this decline, governments and agencies are promoting conservation measures. However, these initiatives may lead to conservation conflicts associated with competing land uses. This study analyzes the potential for us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Andonegi, Aitor, Garmendia Oleaga, Eneko, Aldezabal Roteta, María Arantzazu
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad del País Vasco
Repositorio:Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
OAI Identifier:oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/70831
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10810/70831
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:competing land uses
management scenarios
mountain areas
biodiversity conservation
multispecies grazing system
Natura 2000
id ES_12ba72aeeeb2c6a2fae0fffaf3746bb2
oai_identifier_str oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/70831
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflictsAndonegi, AitorGarmendia Oleaga, EnekoAldezabal Roteta, María Arantzazucompeting land usesmanagement scenariosmountain areasbiodiversity conservationmultispecies grazing systemNatura 2000Land use changes are among the primary drivers of declining biodiversity. To reverse this decline, governments and agencies are promoting conservation measures. However, these initiatives may lead to conservation conflicts associated with competing land uses. This study analyzes the potential for using the Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) framework to manage conservation conflicts in multifunctional landscapes with competing land demands. On the basis of lessons learned from a real conservation conflict within the European Natura 2000, the largest network of protected areas in the world, this article provides guidance on how to develop holistic and inclusive processes that consider the multiple dimensions of conflicts. The SMCE framework offers a structured approach for dealing with incommensurate values, addressing trade-offs and their impacts on affected parties. The transparent and inclusive decision-making processes it provides are heralded as key factors for managing conservation conflicts and search equitable and effective solutions.This research project was funded by a MINECO project (AGL2013–48361-C2–1-12) and Basque Government Research Group Grants (IT1022–16 and IT1365–19). A. Andonegi also acknowledges a pre-doctoral grant from the University of the Basque Country.Prof. Guy M Robinson  202420242021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/70831reponame:Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigacióninstname:Universidad del País VascoInglésinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/AGL2013–48361-C2–1-12/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105658info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/© 2021 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND licenseoai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/708312026-06-18T09:23:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
title Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
spellingShingle Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
Andonegi, Aitor
competing land uses
management scenarios
mountain areas
biodiversity conservation
multispecies grazing system
Natura 2000
title_short Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
title_full Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
title_fullStr Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
title_sort Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Andonegi, Aitor
Garmendia Oleaga, Eneko
Aldezabal Roteta, María Arantzazu
author Andonegi, Aitor
author_facet Andonegi, Aitor
Garmendia Oleaga, Eneko
Aldezabal Roteta, María Arantzazu
author_role author
author2 Garmendia Oleaga, Eneko
Aldezabal Roteta, María Arantzazu
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv competing land uses
management scenarios
mountain areas
biodiversity conservation
multispecies grazing system
Natura 2000
topic competing land uses
management scenarios
mountain areas
biodiversity conservation
multispecies grazing system
Natura 2000
description Land use changes are among the primary drivers of declining biodiversity. To reverse this decline, governments and agencies are promoting conservation measures. However, these initiatives may lead to conservation conflicts associated with competing land uses. This study analyzes the potential for using the Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) framework to manage conservation conflicts in multifunctional landscapes with competing land demands. On the basis of lessons learned from a real conservation conflict within the European Natura 2000, the largest network of protected areas in the world, this article provides guidance on how to develop holistic and inclusive processes that consider the multiple dimensions of conflicts. The SMCE framework offers a structured approach for dealing with incommensurate values, addressing trade-offs and their impacts on affected parties. The transparent and inclusive decision-making processes it provides are heralded as key factors for managing conservation conflicts and search equitable and effective solutions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10810/70831
url http://hdl.handle.net/10810/70831
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/AGL2013–48361-C2–1-12/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105658
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
© 2021 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
© 2021 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Prof. Guy M Robinson  
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Prof. Guy M Robinson  
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
instname:Universidad del País Vasco
instname_str Universidad del País Vasco
reponame_str Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
collection Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403634107678720
score 15,81155

Similares en LA Referencia