La prueba prohibida ante el tribunal europeo de derechos humanos: luces y sombras del caso zherdev c. Ucrania
The European Court of Human Rights, like other national and international courts, has analyzed the admissibility of evidence that has been obtained through the violation of fundamental rights. Its posture throughout the years has focused on determining whether the proceedings as a whole, including t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Valladolid |
| Repositorio: | UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/28405 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/28405 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Garantías (Derecho comunitario) Prueba (Derecho procesal) |
| Sumario: | The European Court of Human Rights, like other national and international courts, has analyzed the admissibility of evidence that has been obtained through the violation of fundamental rights. Its posture throughout the years has focused on determining whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was obtained, were fair according to article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the judgment of Zherdev v. Ukraine, the Court examined different violations of fundamental rights that resulted in the production of incriminatory evidence used to convict a minor defendant. In the following pages we summarize and analyze the Court’s posture regarding unlawfully obtained evidence, according to the guidelines established in this recent case. |
|---|