Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management

Controlling invasive species presents a public-good dilemma. Although environmental, social, and economic benefits of control accrue to society, costs are borne by only a few individuals and organizations. For decades, policy makers have used incentives and sanctions to encourage or coerce individua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Graham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559, Metcalf, Alexander L.|||0000-0001-9532-585X, Gill, Nicholas, Niemiec, Rebecca|||0000-0002-7561-8951, Moreno, Carlo, Bach, Thomas, Ikutegbe, Victoria, Hallstrom, Lars, Ma, Zhao|||0000-0002-9103-3996, Lubeck, Alice
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:202237
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/202237
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/cobi.13266
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Alien species
Comanagement
Cooperation
Coordination
Non-native species
Participation
Social dilemma
id ES_0c0e71fed29b70e373fbb2d91f3ceb0a
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:202237
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species managementGraham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559Metcalf, Alexander L.|||0000-0001-9532-585XGill, NicholasNiemiec, Rebecca|||0000-0002-7561-8951Moreno, CarloBach, ThomasIkutegbe, VictoriaHallstrom, LarsMa, Zhao|||0000-0002-9103-3996Lubeck, AliceAlien speciesComanagementCooperationCoordinationNon-native speciesParticipationSocial dilemmaControlling invasive species presents a public-good dilemma. Although environmental, social, and economic benefits of control accrue to society, costs are borne by only a few individuals and organizations. For decades, policy makers have used incentives and sanctions to encourage or coerce individual actors to contribute to the public good, with limited success. Diverse, subnational efforts to collectively manage invasive plants, insects, and animals provide effective alternatives to traditional command-and-control approaches. Despite this work, there has been little systematic evaluation of collective efforts to determine whether there are consistent principles underpinning success. We reviewed 32 studies to identify the extent to which collectiveaction theories from related agricultural and environmental fields explain collaborative invasive species management approaches; describe and differentiate emergent invasive species collective-action efforts; and provide guidance on how to enable more collaborative approaches to invasive species management. We identified 4 types of collective action aimed at invasive species-externally led, community led, comanaged, and organizational coalitions-that provide blueprints for future invasive species management. Existing collective-action theories could explain the importance attributed to developing shared knowledge of the socialecological system and the need for social capital. Yet, collection action on invasive species requires different types of monitoring, sanctions, and boundary definitions. We argue that future government policies can benefit from establishing flexible boundaries that encourage social learning and enable colocated individuals and organizations to identify common goals, pool resources, and coordinate efforts.Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals 22018-01-0120182018-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/202237https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/cobi.13266reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 MDM-2015-0552open accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2022372026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
title Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
spellingShingle Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
Graham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559
Alien species
Comanagement
Cooperation
Coordination
Non-native species
Participation
Social dilemma
title_short Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
title_full Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
title_fullStr Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
title_full_unstemmed Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
title_sort Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Graham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559
Metcalf, Alexander L.|||0000-0001-9532-585X
Gill, Nicholas
Niemiec, Rebecca|||0000-0002-7561-8951
Moreno, Carlo
Bach, Thomas
Ikutegbe, Victoria
Hallstrom, Lars
Ma, Zhao|||0000-0002-9103-3996
Lubeck, Alice
author Graham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559
author_facet Graham Buch, Sonia|||0000-0003-4195-4559
Metcalf, Alexander L.|||0000-0001-9532-585X
Gill, Nicholas
Niemiec, Rebecca|||0000-0002-7561-8951
Moreno, Carlo
Bach, Thomas
Ikutegbe, Victoria
Hallstrom, Lars
Ma, Zhao|||0000-0002-9103-3996
Lubeck, Alice
author_role author
author2 Metcalf, Alexander L.|||0000-0001-9532-585X
Gill, Nicholas
Niemiec, Rebecca|||0000-0002-7561-8951
Moreno, Carlo
Bach, Thomas
Ikutegbe, Victoria
Hallstrom, Lars
Ma, Zhao|||0000-0002-9103-3996
Lubeck, Alice
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Alien species
Comanagement
Cooperation
Coordination
Non-native species
Participation
Social dilemma
topic Alien species
Comanagement
Cooperation
Coordination
Non-native species
Participation
Social dilemma
description Controlling invasive species presents a public-good dilemma. Although environmental, social, and economic benefits of control accrue to society, costs are borne by only a few individuals and organizations. For decades, policy makers have used incentives and sanctions to encourage or coerce individual actors to contribute to the public good, with limited success. Diverse, subnational efforts to collectively manage invasive plants, insects, and animals provide effective alternatives to traditional command-and-control approaches. Despite this work, there has been little systematic evaluation of collective efforts to determine whether there are consistent principles underpinning success. We reviewed 32 studies to identify the extent to which collectiveaction theories from related agricultural and environmental fields explain collaborative invasive species management approaches; describe and differentiate emergent invasive species collective-action efforts; and provide guidance on how to enable more collaborative approaches to invasive species management. We identified 4 types of collective action aimed at invasive species-externally led, community led, comanaged, and organizational coalitions-that provide blueprints for future invasive species management. Existing collective-action theories could explain the importance attributed to developing shared knowledge of the socialecological system and the need for social capital. Yet, collection action on invasive species requires different types of monitoring, sanctions, and boundary definitions. We argue that future government policies can benefit from establishing flexible boundaries that encourage social learning and enable colocated individuals and organizations to identify common goals, pool resources, and coordinate efforts.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2018-01-01
2018
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/202237
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/cobi.13266
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/202237
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/cobi.13266
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 MDM-2015-0552
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403262856200192
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia