Judicial Pluralism, Autonomy, and Separatism in Bolivian Politics
The article proposes to unveil some of the paradoxes resulting from the new Bolivian Constitution, especially those deriving from a) the end of the traditional division between strong and weak pluralism, b) the duplication of powers that presupposes the exercise of an indigenous citizenry that expre...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2011 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales |
| Repositorio: | Revista ICONOS |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec:article/754 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/754 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Constitution judicial pluralism autonomies separatism first peoples. Constitución Pluralismo jurídico Autonomías Separatismo Pueblos originarios Judicial pluralism Autonomies Separatism First peoples |
| Sumario: | The article proposes to unveil some of the paradoxes resulting from the new Bolivian Constitution, especially those deriving from a) the end of the traditional division between strong and weak pluralism, b) the duplication of powers that presupposes the exercise of an indigenous citizenry that expresses itself at the individual and community level, and c) the possibility of altering state functioning as a privileged undertaking open to economic capital and traditional private interests. |
|---|