THE OPACITY OF THE LAW IN THE COSTA RICAN LEGAL SYSTEM. TWO SPECIFIC CASES: LEGAL PLURALISM AND LEX MERCATORIA
The general objective of this article is to tap on two fundamental aspects visible in Carcova's book “The Opacity of Law”, and these are precisely: firstly, the maxim nemini licet ignorare jus as a legal fiction of the Costa Rican legal system. Secondly, the issue of the presence of legal plura...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Costa Rica |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/57071 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/iusdoctrina/article/view/57071 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Opacity grey zones legal fiction legal pluralism lex mercatoria Opacidad zonas grises ficción jurídica pluralismo jurídico |
| Sumario: | The general objective of this article is to tap on two fundamental aspects visible in Carcova's book “The Opacity of Law”, and these are precisely: firstly, the maxim nemini licet ignorare jus as a legal fiction of the Costa Rican legal system. Secondly, the issue of the presence of legal pluralism in our system. Simultaneously raised two specific cases that exemplify this particularity. |
|---|