La resistencia a la constitucionalización del Derecho administrativo en Colombia: el Consejo de Estado y el caso de los actos discrecionales que ordenan el retiro
The purpose of this article is to analyze the intensity of the constitutionalization in Colombian administrative law, especially in discretionary administrative acts, that command the retirement of members of the Military Forces, Police, Administrative Department of Security (DAS) and Penitentiary N...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Colombia |
| Institución: | Universidad de la Sabana |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13539 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704 http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704/2202 http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704/2230 http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13539 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Constitucionalización del ordenamiento jurídico Actos administrativos discrecionales Inseguridad jurídica Debido proceso |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this article is to analyze the intensity of the constitutionalization in Colombian administrative law, especially in discretionary administrative acts, that command the retirement of members of the Military Forces, Police, Administrative Department of Security (DAS) and Penitentiary National Institute of Colombia (INPEC). In order to achieve said purpose, the author compares –through dynamic and static analysis of case lawthe readings made by the Council of State and the Constitutional Court, and concludes that the position of the latter is the most legally convenient and the most efficient when it comes to the administration of public resources, therefore, it must be accepted by the Council of State. The convenience analysis uses as reference points 1) some constitutional principles; 2) the Constitutional State; 3) the national and foreign administrative doctrine; and 4) some InterAmerican Court of Human Rights rulings. |
|---|