Paul Ricoeur: a esperança como movimento da existência no evento da ressurreição
Our thesis consists in showing that in Ricœur, hope is a movement of existence in the event of Resurrection. This movement of expectation suggests a completion of the fundamental ontology of the free volitional subject within an event like Resurrection. This hope in the event of the resurrection sug...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20129 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20129 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Ricoeur, Paul [1913-2005] - Crítica e interpretação Hermenêutica - Aspectos religiosos - Cristianismo Escatologia Ressurreição Hermeneutics - Religious aspects - Christianity Eschatology Resurrection CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
| Sumario: | Our thesis consists in showing that in Ricœur, hope is a movement of existence in the event of Resurrection. This movement of expectation suggests a completion of the fundamental ontology of the free volitional subject within an event like Resurrection. This hope in the event of the resurrection suggests a philosophical place in Ricœur's writings from 1947 to 1972. In the light of these writings, hope is the connector, a threshold theme, between philosophy and theology, that articulates these two disciplines in an excellent way. For Ricœur, Hope is not a theme that comes after the other themes, the idea that closes the system, but an impulse that opens the system, which breaks the closure of the system: it is a way to reopen what was improperly closed. Hope, in the end, unveils the aspects of reality and opens the transcendente dimension of the existence of man. To do so, we will analyze the writings of Paul Ricœur in the period suggested above, which does not prevent us from citing texts after the period, without the pretension, however, of trying to cover the whole trajectory of the hermeneutics of Ricœurian |
|---|