echnical-tactical performance assessment in tennis: a systematic review of measurement instruments
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to review the literature to identify instruments for assessing technical-tactical performance in tennis.METHODS: A systematic review study was carried out. The search for articles was carried out in the SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases, using the terms tennis AND perfor...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
| Repositorio: | Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/24578 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/24578 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Estudos de validação Desempenho Atlético Esportes Tênis Revisão Sistemática Validation Studies Athletic Performance Sports Tennis Systematic Review |
| Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to review the literature to identify instruments for assessing technical-tactical performance in tennis.METHODS: A systematic review study was carried out. The search for articles was carried out in the SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases, using the terms tennis AND performance AND assessment. The inclusion criteria established for this study were: (1) instrument validation articles; (2) dealing with at least one technical or tactical aspect; (3) that were specific to tennis. From a range of 422 articles found, we selected seven for this review. RESULTS: The selected instruments evaluated mostly the technical-tactical aspects of tennis in an integrated way, covering from the child community to the high performance adult community. We observed a greater number of assessment instruments applied to the context of training in relation to the competition context. All studies presented at least one evidence of validity, and only two studies did not show evidence of reliability.CONCLUSION: This review can help coaches and researchers to choose the most appropriate assessment tool according to the context and to their targeted goals. |
|---|