Dogmática Jurídico-Penal: sua Compreensão e os Pressupostos Argumentativos das Escolas Penais
Dogmatic is presented as a set of argumentative assumptions indispensable for the development of knowledge, which the subsequent developments can not deny. Applied to the science of law, this concept provides a coherent system of propositions, institutionally organized and legislative content, built...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
| Repositorio: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/18485 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistafadir/article/view/18485 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Dogmática jurídica positivismo neokantismo finalismo funcionalismo Legal dogmatic positivism neokantism finalism funcionalism |
| Resumo: | Dogmatic is presented as a set of argumentative assumptions indispensable for the development of knowledge, which the subsequent developments can not deny. Applied to the science of law, this concept provides a coherent system of propositions, institutionally organized and legislative content, built to resolvepractical issues. From that argumentative coherence in the field of criminal law, different theoretical schools succeeded, focusing, each of them, to various social problems and realities. The positivism, the neokantism, the finalism and funcionalism were structured in firm supports and earn more sense when understood historically. |
|---|