Vozes Amplificadas, Mudanças Limitadas? Repensando a complexa relação entre Democracia, Regulação e Internet

https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2025/89273i This study's central question is: how does the internet impact political participation and democracy? The internet has reconfigured the dynamics of democracy, enabling more direct dialogue between representatives and civil society. It also imposes n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sena, Lucas, Otaviano Soares , Guilherme
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2025
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
Repository:Revista Direito e Práxis
Language:Portuguese
English
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/89273
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/89273
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Internet
Democracy
Regulation
Digital Platforms
Political Participation
Democracia
Regulação
Plataformas Digitais
Participação Política
Description
Summary:https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2025/89273i This study's central question is: how does the internet impact political participation and democracy? The internet has reconfigured the dynamics of democracy, enabling more direct dialogue between representatives and civil society. It also imposes new challenges, particularly regarding the limits of digital platform usage and their increasing appropriation for illicit purposes. Given this scenario, this article analyzes the complex relationship between the internet, regulation, and democracy, emphasizing the role of digital platforms in political participation and the emerging regulatory challenges. To this end, the work is structured into four parts, besides this introduction and the concluding remarks: the first section contextualizes the intersection of democracy, participation, and the internet; the second addresses the phenomenon of cyberactivism and digital social movements, analyzing their potentialities and limitations; the third section delves deeper into themes such as control, access to information, and the participatory pathways enabled by digital media; and the fourth section discusses aspects of internet regulation and governance, with a comparison between the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Brazil's proposed Fake News Bill (PL 2630/2020). The concluding remarks point to a scenario of increasing tension between state regulation and the resistance of digital platforms to complying with judicial orders, highlighting a new chapter in this complex relationship and prompting reflections on the future of democracy in the digital age.