The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar
This article aims to investigate, from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar (Hengeveld & Mackenzie, 2008), the functional motivations of clauses introduced by pero and to discuss the communicative status of the clauses introduced by that conjunction, which represents an argumentat...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| Repositorio: | Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/55427 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/55427 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pero; argumentation; functionalism; adversatives. Pero; argumentación; funcionalismo; adversativas. |
| id |
BR_bc88e5aaa9595fc841fe16599e4e557d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/55427 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar El estatuto comunicativo de cláusulas con pero: un análisis desde la perspectiva de la Gramática Discursivo-Funcional |
| title |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| spellingShingle |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar Pedro, Carolina da Costa Pero; argumentation; functionalism; adversatives. Pero; argumentación; funcionalismo; adversativas. |
| title_short |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| title_full |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| title_fullStr |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| title_sort |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa Garcia, Talita Storti |
| author |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa |
| author_facet |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa Garcia, Talita Storti |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Garcia, Talita Storti |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pero; argumentation; functionalism; adversatives. Pero; argumentación; funcionalismo; adversativas. |
| topic |
Pero; argumentation; functionalism; adversatives. Pero; argumentación; funcionalismo; adversativas. |
| description |
This article aims to investigate, from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar (Hengeveld & Mackenzie, 2008), the functional motivations of clauses introduced by pero and to discuss the communicative status of the clauses introduced by that conjunction, which represents an argumentation strategy in the terms of Ascombre and Ducrot (1977). According to Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), the conjunction equivalent to pero, but, in English, acts between two Discursive Acts with different status, in which one is Subsidiary, the one presenting the rhetorical function Concession (Conc), and the other, Nuclear. This means that the Nuclear Act, from the Speaker's point of view, contains the most important communicative information, which is encoded, according to the model, by pero at the Morphosyntactic Level. The results show that the uses of pero show pragmatic purposes. The The data shows that pero acts at the highest levels of the Interpersonal Level, the Discursive Act and the Movement. The research universe is the PRESEEA corpus (Project for the study of Spanish in Spain and America), with examples from the cities of Granada and Alcalá de Henares, in Spain. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-02 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/55427 10.4025/actascilangcult.v43i2.55427 |
| url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/55427 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascilangcult.v43i2.55427 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/55427/751375153128 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 43 No 2 (2021): July-Dec.; e55427 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 43 n. 2 (2021): July-Dec.; e55427 1983-4683 1983-4675 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| instacron_str |
UEM |
| institution |
UEM |
| reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
| collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actalan@uem.br |
| _version_ |
1853660171780227072 |
| spelling |
The communicative status of clauses with pero: an analysis from the perspective of Functional Discourse GrammarEl estatuto comunicativo de cláusulas con pero: un análisis desde la perspectiva de la Gramática Discursivo-FuncionalPero; argumentation; functionalism; adversatives.Pero; argumentación; funcionalismo; adversativas.This article aims to investigate, from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar (Hengeveld & Mackenzie, 2008), the functional motivations of clauses introduced by pero and to discuss the communicative status of the clauses introduced by that conjunction, which represents an argumentation strategy in the terms of Ascombre and Ducrot (1977). According to Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), the conjunction equivalent to pero, but, in English, acts between two Discursive Acts with different status, in which one is Subsidiary, the one presenting the rhetorical function Concession (Conc), and the other, Nuclear. This means that the Nuclear Act, from the Speaker's point of view, contains the most important communicative information, which is encoded, according to the model, by pero at the Morphosyntactic Level. The results show that the uses of pero show pragmatic purposes. The The data shows that pero acts at the highest levels of the Interpersonal Level, the Discursive Act and the Movement. The research universe is the PRESEEA corpus (Project for the study of Spanish in Spain and America), with examples from the cities of Granada and Alcalá de Henares, in Spain.Este artículo se propone demostrar, bajo la perspectiva de la Gramática Discursivo-Funcional (Hengeveld y Mackenzie, 2008), las motivaciones funcionales de las cláusulas introducidas por ‘pero’ y discutir el estatuto comunicativo de las cláusulas introducidas por ese juntor. Según Hengeveld y Mackenzie (2008), ‘but’ [‘pero’] actúa entre dos Actos Discursivos con estatutos distintos, en que uno es Subsidiario, al que se atribuye la función retórica Concesión (Conc), y el otro, Nuclear. Eso significa que el Acto Nuclear, desde el punto de vista del Hablante, contiene la información comunicativamente más importante. Esta distinción se codifica en el Nivel Morfosintáctico con la Palabra Gramatical ‘pero’. Los resultados muestran que los usos de ‘pero’ sirven a propósitos pragmáticos. Los datos revelan que ‘pero’ actúa en los estratos superiores del Nivel Interpersonal, el Acto Discursivo y el Movimiento. Cuando actúa entre dos Actos Discursivos, el segundo es el que presenta el contenido más importante. Esa constatación coincide con el gran valor argumentativo de ‘pero’ reconocido por Anscombre y Ducrot (1977) bajo el punto de vista de la argumentación. El universo de investigación utilizado es el corpus (Proyecto Para el Estudio Sociolinguístico del Español de España y de América [PRESEEA], 2014), con ejemplos de las ciudades de Granada y de Alcalá de Henares, en España.This article aims to investigate, from the perspective of Functional Discourse Grammar (Hengeveld y Mackenzie, 2008), the functional motivations of clauses introduced by ‘pero’ and to discuss the communicative status of the clauses introduced by that conjunction. According to Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), ‘but’ [‘pero’] acts between two Discursive Acts with a different status, in which one is Subsidiary, the one presenting the rhetorical function Concession (Conc), and the other, Nuclear. This means that the Nuclear Act, from the Speaker's point of view, contains the most important communicative information. This distinction is encoded at the Morphosyntactic Level, with the Grammatical Word ‘pero’. The results show that the uses of ‘pero’ show pragmatic purposes. The data shows that pero acts at the highest levels of the Interpersonal Level, the Discursive Act, and the Movement. When it acts between two Discursive Acts, the second one present the most important content. This finding coincides with the great argumentative value of ‘but’ recognized by Anscombre and Ducrot (1977) from the point of view of argumentation. The research universe is the PRESEEA corpus (Project for the study of Spanish in Spain and America [PRESEEA], 2014), with examples from the cities of Granada and Alcalá de Henares, in Spain.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2021-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/5542710.4025/actascilangcult.v43i2.55427Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 43 No 2 (2021): July-Dec.; e55427Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 43 n. 2 (2021): July-Dec.; e554271983-46831983-4675reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMspahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/55427/751375153128Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culturehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Pedro, Carolina da CostaGarcia, Talita Storti 2022-02-17T22:22:09Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/55427Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCultPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/oai||actalan@uem.br1983-46831983-4675opendoar:2022-02-17T22:22:09Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
| score |
15,300719 |