Knowledge dialogue, translation work and inter-scientificity: possible intersections in the teaching of chemistry

In this essay we aim to present intersections between the contributions of both authors, the anthropologist Manuela Cunha, and the sociologist Maria Conceição de Almeida, regarding the possible knowledge dialogues allying traditional and scientific knowledge, the contributions of the sociologist Boa...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Santana , Ramon de Oliveira, Silva, Wesley Pereira da, Mol , Gerson de Souza
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2021
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)
Repositório:Debates em Educação
Idioma:português
OAI Identifier:oai:www.seer.ufal.br:article/13056
Acesso em linha:https://www.seer.ufal.br/index.php/debateseducacao/article/view/13056
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Inter-scientificity
Knowledge dialogue
Translation work
Diálogo de saberes
Intercientificidade
Trabalho de tradução
Descrição
Resumo:In this essay we aim to present intersections between the contributions of both authors, the anthropologist Manuela Cunha, and the sociologist Maria Conceição de Almeida, regarding the possible knowledge dialogues allying traditional and scientific knowledge, the contributions of the sociologist Boaventura de Sousa Santos, regarding the work of translation, and the notion of inter-scientificity set by the anthropologist Paul Little. The reflections point out that innumerable intersections are possible and present contributions to research that has as its theme the use of popular knowledge for teaching Science / Chemistry. Theoretical support that underlies our discussion brings considerations that collaborate with the necessary care to work with the dialogue between traditional and scientific knowledge in Formal Education. The intersections point to possible and fundamental ways to strengthen the production of transformative pedagogical practices that value all those involved and directly contribute to the strengthening of local struggles, avoiding, thereby, the expropriation of knowledge, marginalization of those involved and hierarchy of knowledge.