Field Education as a counterpoint to digital colonialism in peasant territories
The countryside is recognized as a diverse place, formed by territorial identities that are inserted in the class struggle in the context of globalized urban-rural capitalism. With the advance of the technical-scientific-information environment, new tools emerge that promote globalization over these...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
| Repositorio: | Campo - Território |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71131 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/71131 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | território Educação do Campo globalização colonialismo digital colonialismo de dados territory Field Education globalization digital colonialism data colonialism |
| Sumario: | The countryside is recognized as a diverse place, formed by territorial identities that are inserted in the class struggle in the context of globalized urban-rural capitalism. With the advance of the technical-scientific-information environment, new tools emerge that promote globalization over these territories, exploiting them and maximizing profit through what is called Digital Colonialism and/or Data Colonialism. This characterizes the era of surveillance capitalism, in which all aspects of human experience are exploited for the accumulation of capital. The Movement for a Field Education is presented as a counterpoint to these forms of exploitation, and the research conducted addresses the topic through a bibliographical research that allows a broad analysis of phenomena already studied. The objective of the research is to understand how these new forms of exploitation affect the peasant territory and how the movement for a Field Education can be used as an alternative to mitigate the effects and advances of this exploitation and expropriation of the educational, cultural, political, social and economic aspects of the territories and peoples of the countryside. |
|---|