Análise crítica do princípio da insignificância e sua aplicação no direito penal brasileiro

This master's thesis proposes a critical analysis of the so-called principle of insignificance and its application in Brazilian Criminal Law, which results in the recognition of the material atypicality of conducts that, at least formally, fall within the scope of incriminating criminal provisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Stempniewski, Ligia Penha
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Brasil
Institución:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/45403
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/45403
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
Insignificância
Bagatela
Atipicidade material
Impunidade
Insignificance
Triviality
Material atypicality
Impunity
Descripción
Sumario:This master's thesis proposes a critical analysis of the so-called principle of insignificance and its application in Brazilian Criminal Law, which results in the recognition of the material atypicality of conducts that, at least formally, fall within the scope of incriminating criminal provisions. The objective of the research is to assess whether there are legally sound criteria for the application of this principle or whether, by relying on subjective parameters to define which conducts are criminally irrelevant, the legal system strays from the original purpose of the theory of insignificance and from the prevailing understanding of what constitutes a negligible value for the Brazilian population. Initially, the study focuses on the theory of the legal interest protected by criminal law (bem jurídico-penal), whose protection is the core function of Criminal Law. Subsequently, both the explicit and implicit principles that support the existence of the principle of insignificance are examined. Next, the origin of the concept is analyzed based on the teachings of German criminal law scholar Claus Roxin, who coined the term in the 1970s. The thesis also explores the criteria established by legal doctrine and case law for recognizing so-called insignificant conduct, with references to judicial decisions and doctrinal positions on the application of the principle to various criminal offenses. Finally, after presenting critiques of the recognition of material atypicality in conducts that may be of lesser gravity—but not insignificant—, the thesis explores alternative legal mechanisms already provided for in Brazilian law, which may offer more reliable solutions to the issue of criminal liability, while upholding the principle of proportionality