Podem as práticas epistêmicas contribuir para o desenvolvimento de competências metacognitivas?
Studies in Science Education and Cognitive Sciences have indicated the need to address social aspects in order to promote in the classroom the students' thought processes on aspects related to the construction and justification of understandingabout science and phenomena of the natural world. H...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/82960 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5335/rep.v30i0.14897 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/82960 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-7821 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-3090 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-9590 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Metacognição Práticas Epistêmicas Ensino de Ciências |
| Sumario: | Studies in Science Education and Cognitive Sciences have indicated the need to address social aspects in order to promote in the classroom the students' thought processes on aspects related to the construction and justification of understandingabout science and phenomena of the natural world. However, many of these studies have addressed only cognition, suppressing metacognition, that is, the knowledge that each student has of their own cognitive processes and products, including the monitoringand evaluation of this cognitive system. The aim of this paper is to consider the role of epistemic practices as promoters of metacognitive competences in didactic actions in science teaching. The developed reflection and discussion suggesta relationshipbetween the mobilization of epistemicpractices and the development of metacognitive competences, with regard to the metacognitive elements that constitute the regulation of cognition (planning, monitoring, evaluation, information managementstrategiesand debuggingstrategies). This relationship consolidates learning as a (meta)cognitive and social process. As prospects for future studies, it will be important to analyze and refine the potential of metacognition, allied to epistemic practices, as pedagogical guiding in the educational field, and as a theoretical-methodological framework. |
|---|