Teaching and assessment methods in preceptorship in health residencies: Cross-sectional study

Through a cross-sectional study, this study aimed to identify the teaching and evaluation methodologies used by health residency preceptors, in addition to associated factors, prior to a specialization course in multi-professional preceptorship. At the beginning of the course, between August and Sep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Wander, Brenda, Fernandes, Alessandra Tavares Francisco, Daudt, Carmen Vera Giacobbo, Leite, Ana Paula Tussi
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
Repositorio:Revista Temas em Educação e Saúde
Idioma:portugués
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19113
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/tes/article/view/19113
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Preceptorship
Internship and residency
Internship, nonmedical
Multiprofessional residency
Preceptoría
Internado y residência
Residencia no médica no dental
Residencia multiprofesional
Preceptoria
Internato e residência
Residência não médica não odontológica
Residência multiprofissional
Descripción
Sumario:Through a cross-sectional study, this study aimed to identify the teaching and evaluation methodologies used by health residency preceptors, in addition to associated factors, prior to a specialization course in multi-professional preceptorship. At the beginning of the course, between August and September 2022, 1112 preceptors from all regions of the country and levels of health care responded to an online questionnaire. The most used teaching and assessment methods are, respectively, case discussion (92.09%) and direct observation (78.69%). Preceptors who receive additional remuneration use more PBL and flipped classrooms, assessment in clinical practice environments, and 360° assessment. Assessment methods involving simulation and Mini-CEX are used by less than 10% of preceptors. Only 53.15% offer feedback on formal assessments. The variety and frequency of methodologies used, as well as feedback provision, must be considered when planning new preceptorship training.