O conceito de igualdade na filosofia política contemporânea: Um debate entre Rawls, Dworkin e Amartya Sen
One of the most interesting questions of the contemporary debate about justice, in the context of normative political theory, is about which concerns that should occupy the central position of an egalitarian perspective: equality based on satisfaction of basic needs, primary goods as proposed by Raw...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12272 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/12272 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | John Rawls Ronald Dworkin Amartya Sen Igualdade Equality |
| Sumario: | One of the most interesting questions of the contemporary debate about justice, in the context of normative political theory, is about which concerns that should occupy the central position of an egalitarian perspective: equality based on satisfaction of basic needs, primary goods as proposed by Rawls, equality of resources such as Dworkin argues, or like Amartya Sen, equal capabilities? With what egalitarians should be concerned about? This paper aims to analyze these three perspectives. |
|---|