The Right to Civil Disobedience as one of the Sovereign’s Original Rights in Habermas and an attempt to Respond to Raz’s Critique
The text deals with civil disobedience as a right. Indeed, civil disobedience is understood by Habermas as one of the original rights of the sovereign. The paper reconstructs Raz’s objection that civil disobedience is not a right and takes this objection seriously in order to scrutinize some consequ...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| Repositorio: | Veritas (Porto Alegre. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/45761 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/veritas/article/view/45761 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | desobediência civil direito Habermas Raz civil disobedience Right desobediencia civil derecho |
| Sumario: | The text deals with civil disobedience as a right. Indeed, civil disobedience is understood by Habermas as one of the original rights of the sovereign. The paper reconstructs Raz’s objection that civil disobedience is not a right and takes this objection seriously in order to scrutinize some consequences that such a formulation might have for Habermas’s theory. It is argued that the version of civil disobedience sustained by Habermas can offer an answer to Raz’s objection. |
|---|