When the Law is Deaf:: A Recent Case in the History of the Relation between Psychology and Law
This paper presents an analysis of José’s case, a deaf-mute who was treated as insane and, for being accused of murder attempt, was condemned to reclusion in a mental hospital. The case is an example of what Michel Foucault calls ubu-esque and enlights the relationships between Psychology and Law, s...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17846 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17846 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Surdez Ubuesco Foucault Direito Subjetividade Deafness Ubuesque Law Subjectivity |
| Resumo: | This paper presents an analysis of José’s case, a deaf-mute who was treated as insane and, for being accused of murder attempt, was condemned to reclusion in a mental hospital. The case is an example of what Michel Foucault calls ubu-esque and enlights the relationships between Psychology and Law, specially the political fundamentals in Forensic Psychology. |
|---|