Em nome do Laico, do Cisma, da Liberdade Religiosa, amém

This paper discusses how religious freedom is being presented at the Brazilian Parliament. First, a short conceptual discussion on secularization and laicité is presented, assuming that both categories refer to religious transformations in modernity, although with different meanings: whereas secular...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Weber, Bruno Curtis
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2021
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Repository:Plural (São Paulo. Online)
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usp.br:article/179714
Online Access:https://www.revistas.usp.br/plural/article/view/179714
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Secularization
Laicité
Religious freedom
Brazilian National Congress
Secularização
Laicidade
Liberdade religiosa
Congresso Nacional
Description
Summary:This paper discusses how religious freedom is being presented at the Brazilian Parliament. First, a short conceptual discussion on secularization and laicité is presented, assuming that both categories refer to religious transformations in modernity, although with different meanings: whereas secularization regards a “split” between State and religion, laicité refers to multiples religious participation perspectives on public sphere – atheist included. The latter has become a constitutional principle through the institution of freedom of believe. Second, a qualitative analysis of 72 draft bills on religious freedom issues in course on the Brazilian National Congress is presented. Data suggests that both categories – the separation between State and religion, and religious participation on public sphere – are set by representatives in the name of freedom of believe, but specifically on christian axiological perspective. Therefore, religious pluralism, a fundamental principle to constructing laicité and religious freedom, has been put into question by legislative practice.