Mediação e difusão em arquivos inter-relações teóricas

Archives are institutions with different functions for society and, therefore, need to be recognized from different archival processes and practices. Therefore, this article aims to discuss some possibilities of mediation and diffusion in archives from the interrelationship between these concepts an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Santos Neto, João Arlindo dos, Bortolin, Sueli
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/52744
Acceso en línea:http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/52744
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Mediação em arquivos
Difusão em arquivos
Mediação e difusão cultural
Mediação pedagógica
Difusão educativa
Descripción
Sumario:Archives are institutions with different functions for society and, therefore, need to be recognized from different archival processes and practices. Therefore, this article aims to discuss some possibilities of mediation and diffusion in archives from the interrelationship between these concepts and to elucidate the possible approximations between them. As specific objectives, it discusses mediation and dissemination within the archives and highlights the need to increase the visibility of both archivists and the archives' ambience. As a methodological procedure, it carries out a basic research, of an exploratory-descriptive character, with bibliographic design. As a result, he considers that, historically, in the Archivology literature the concept of diffusion in archives is more used when compared to that of information mediation. It concludes, from the bibliographic review, that there is a proximity between the concepts of cultural mediation and cultural diffusion, pedagogical mediation and educational diffusion, and their practices, but that present their own theoretical and conceptual demarcations that distinguish them.