Como são tratadas as fraturas diafisárias fechadas do fêmur no Brasil? Estudo transversal

A cross-sectional study was performed during the 36th Brazilian Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, where the opinions of Brazilian orthopaedic surgeons addressing the treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures in adults were surveyed. Five hundred and seven questionnaires were fully completed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pires, Robinson Esteves Santos [UNIFESP], Fernandes, Hélio Jorge Alvachian [UNIFESP], Belloti, Joao Carlos [UNIFESP], Balbachevsky, Daniel [UNIFESP], Faloppa, Flávio [UNIFESP], Reis, Fernando Baldy dos [UNIFESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2006
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/2869
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522006000300010
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/2869
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Femoral fractures
Cross-sectional studies
Fractures
Fraturas do fêmur
Estudos transversais
Fraturas
Descripción
Sumario:A cross-sectional study was performed during the 36th Brazilian Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, where the opinions of Brazilian orthopaedic surgeons addressing the treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures in adults were surveyed. Five hundred and seven questionnaires were fully completed and the results show agreement in the following topics: fracture trace configuration and injuries of soft parts or neurovascular structures as key parameters for determining treatment; fractures classification, in which AO was most frequently adopted; milled blocked anterograde intramedullary nail for treating cross-sectioned and short oblique factures at the isthmus; bridge plate for treating complex trace fractures; pre-operative skeletal traction; infection as the most frequent complication, and; postoperative low molecular weight heparin. There were opinion conflicts for the following topics: use of traction table for performing intramedullary osteosynthesis, time interval between trauma and surgery; time of antibiotics use, and; mean hospitalization time. Regarding literature, there was agreement concerning key parameters for determining treatment; fixation method for simple-traces fractures at the isthmus; adopted classification; antithrombotic prophylaxis. Issues such as fixation method for complex-traced fractures; time of antibiotics use; average interval between trauma and osteosynthesis, and; hospitalization time were different from literature.