As mulheres conforme a administração: uma ciência para a manutenção da opressão e da exploração?

The objective was to analyze how modern studies in the field of administrative sciences whose object of analysis is women in labor relations explain the inequalities between being a working man and being a working woman. To this end, it was made a theoretical exposition about modern scientificity an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Marília Duarte de Souza, Deise Luiza da Silva Ferraz, Janaynna de Moura Ferraz
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2021
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repository:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/53473
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2021018
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/53473
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-3480
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-8261
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-4195
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Ciência administrativa
Mulheres
Opressão
Emancipação
Opressão (Psicologia)
Direitos das mulheres
Description
Summary:The objective was to analyze how modern studies in the field of administrative sciences whose object of analysis is women in labor relations explain the inequalities between being a working man and being a working woman. To this end, it was made a theoretical exposition about modern scientificity and also the main aspects that permeate the issue of oppression of women was exposed. From a bibliometric survey on the theme “woman” in the field of Administration, and subsequent analysis of qualitative aspects of the texts we found an analytical corpus distributed by subarea and approach, which t made it possible the emersion of the analytical categories “motherhood and homecare” and “femininity versus masculinity”. We conclude that such studies on the subject are recent and scarce, but represent a potential for women’s struggle since the agenda is legitimate whilst scientific. However, they also represent a limitation, because scientific rationality imposes itself over the real, and even those articles that present themselves as critical ones end up, in part, contributing to the naturalization of this oppression