Coaching leadership in the evaluation of nurses, nursing technicians and assistants
Objectives: to identify nurses' self-assessment of leadership coaching and the assessment of Nursing technicians and assistants about their leader. Correlate the variables: age, sex, graduation, postgraduate, institution and training times, position and work shift with the domains of leadership...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Reme (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/49945 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49945 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Liderança Tutoria Enfermagem Liderazgo Tutoría Enfermería Leadership Mentoring Nursing |
| Sumario: | Objectives: to identify nurses' self-assessment of leadership coaching and the assessment of Nursing technicians and assistants about their leader. Correlate the variables: age, sex, graduation, postgraduate, institution and training times, position and work shift with the domains of leadership coaching (communication, feedback, power and influence). Method: correlational study in two hospitals (A and B) in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. For data collection, two validated questionnaires were used called: “Questionnaire for nurses' self-perception in the exercise of leadership” and the other for Nursing technicians and assistants (the led): “Questionnaire for the perception of Nursing technicians and Nursing in the exercise of leadership". The sample, for convenience, consisted of 104 pairs, with 52 nurses and 52 technicians/assistants from hospital A and an equal amount at hospital B. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test were used (p <0.010). Results: at hospital A there was a divergence between the nurses' selfperception of their coaching leadership and the evaluation of Nursing technicians and assistants regarding their leader (p=0.008), considering the total score of the scales. In hospital B, only the “communication” domain was different (p=0.010) and, in this location, the variable graduation of technicians and assistants was significant for “power” (p=0.03). Conclusion: leaders were recognized differently by their leds, considering the domains of leadership coaching. This should be an opportunity for improvement to establish new paths when leading a team and achieving the established goals. |
|---|