Flexible heat exchanger network design of an ethanol processor for hydrogen production. A model-based multi-objective optimization approach

This work addresses the optimal design of a flexible heat exchanger network using model-based optimization, applied to hydrogen production by means of an ethanol steam reforming process. High efficiencies are obtained at different hydrogen production levels ranging from 25 to 100% of a nominal outpu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Francesconi, Javier Andres, Oliva, Diego Gabriel, Aguirre, Pio Antonio
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46980
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46980
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ethanol Processor
Energy Efficiency
Flexible Heat Exchanger Network
Hydrogen
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
Descripción
Sumario:This work addresses the optimal design of a flexible heat exchanger network using model-based optimization, applied to hydrogen production by means of an ethanol steam reforming process. High efficiencies are obtained at different hydrogen production levels ranging from 25 to 100% of a nominal output. System structure, heat exchanger sizing, and operation conditions are simultaneously settled, ensuring both operational feasibility and optimality. The system involves a reforming reactor, vaporization and reheating equipment, combustors, and a heat exchanger network system. A multi-period nonlinear optimization problem (NLP) was formulated to account for the production level distribution. Equipment sizing constraints and structural constraints link the different scenarios. The trade-off between area and efficiency is analyzed using a multi-objective epsilon-constraint approach. Models were developed in the GAMS environment. The resulting solutions, for the maximum area case, maintain alcohol combustion at low levels showing efficiencies around 63% in each operational level. Pareto Optimal diagram shows that a 1% reduction of efficiency allows a 50% decrease in total required heat exchanger area by 50%.