Contingência e necessidade na causalidade externa segundo Ockham: Argumentos para revisar a interpretação dominante
In this paper we provide a summary of what, we believe, has been the dominant trend in the interpretation of Ockham´s doctrine of causality from the past three or four decades up to the present. We intend to develop three strategies to criticise this interpretation, each one belonging to a different...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/188209 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/188209 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | CONTINGÊNCIA NECESSIDADE CAUSALIDADE OCKHAM https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| Sumario: | In this paper we provide a summary of what, we believe, has been the dominant trend in the interpretation of Ockham´s doctrine of causality from the past three or four decades up to the present. We intend to develop three strategies to criticise this interpretation, each one belonging to a different level: ontology and language in the first place, physics in the second one and epistemology in the third one. The result of our exploration is a less optimistic view of Ockham's doctrine of causality than the dominant. |
|---|