Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary

The availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna, Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe, Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo, Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Uruguay
Institución:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Repositorio:LIBERI
Idioma:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/5696
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
cooperação
id UY_d81e53c8e5ca2feec6befa1a5cd4076f
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/5696
network_acronym_str UY
network_name_str Uruguay
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
Desarrollo, validación y evidencias experimentales de un diccionario de prosocialidad
Desenvolvimento, validação e evidências experimentais de um dicionário de pró-socialidade
title Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
spellingShingle Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
title_short Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_full Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_fullStr Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_full_unstemmed Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_sort Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
author_facet Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author_role author
author2 Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
topic public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
dc.subject.pt-PT.fl_str_mv jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
description The availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts that provide evidence of content and external validity for a dictionary designed to assess prosociality, which is compatible with LIWC software. Study 1 is based on a corpus of terms drawn from both natural and specialized sources, evaluated by seven judges, resulting in a definitive list. In Study 2, a public goods game was conducted in which 160 participants faced a dilemma between self-interest and collective well-being. Participants also described the strategies they used in the game and the emotions they experienced. These written responses were analyzed using the dictionary developed in Study 1. The results showed that prosociality, as measured by the dictionary, was positively associated with cooperative behavior in the game. Additionally, cognitive style II was found to predict prosocial behavior. Together, these studies demonstrate the dictionary's utility in evaluating prosociality through linguistic analysis and its potential for estimating this construct in various contexts.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-22T16:34:58Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-22T16:34:58Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-09-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
10.22235/cp.v19i2.4356
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/cp.v19i2.4356
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3906
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3907
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3908
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1688-4221
10.22235/cp.v19i2
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
reponame_str LIBERI
collection LIBERI
repository.name.fl_str_mv LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay
repository.mail.fl_str_mv franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy
_version_ 1870191191426859008
spelling Rojas Landinez, Leidy JohannaMedina-Arboleda, Iván FelipeAguilar-Pardo, David RicardoGarzón-Velandia, Diana Camila2025-09-162025-12-22T16:34:58Z2025-12-22T16:34:58Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/435610.22235/cp.v19i2.4356https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696The availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts that provide evidence of content and external validity for a dictionary designed to assess prosociality, which is compatible with LIWC software. Study 1 is based on a corpus of terms drawn from both natural and specialized sources, evaluated by seven judges, resulting in a definitive list. In Study 2, a public goods game was conducted in which 160 participants faced a dilemma between self-interest and collective well-being. Participants also described the strategies they used in the game and the emotions they experienced. These written responses were analyzed using the dictionary developed in Study 1. The results showed that prosociality, as measured by the dictionary, was positively associated with cooperative behavior in the game. Additionally, cognitive style II was found to predict prosocial behavior. Together, these studies demonstrate the dictionary's utility in evaluating prosociality through linguistic analysis and its potential for estimating this construct in various contexts.La presencia de grandes datos textuales permite el análisis automatizado de constructos psicológicos. Para ello, se han desarrollado programas que categorizan palabras e identifican, entre otros, estilos cognitivos, lingüísticos o contenido emocional. Este trabajo consta de dos estudios que presentan evidencia de validez de contenido y externa de un diccionario para estimar la prosocialidad, compatible con el software LIWC. El Estudio 1 parte de un corpus de términos construido con base en fuentes naturales y especializadas, que fue evaluado por siete jueces, lo que dio paso a la conformación de una lista definitiva. En el Estudio 2 se utilizó un juego de bienes públicos, en el que 160 participantes eligieron en un dilema económico interés propio versus bienestar colectivo. Adicionalmente, los participantes respondieron por escrito qué estrategia habían utilizado en el juego y qué emociones experimentaron. Estos textos fueron analizados con el diccionario construido en el Estudio 1. Se evidenció que la prosocialidad estimada con el diccionario se relacionó positivamente con el comportamiento cooperativo en el juego. Se encontró que el estilo cognitivo tipo II predice el comportamiento prosocial en el juego. Los dos estudios muestran la utilidad del diccionario para evaluar la prosocialidad a través del análisis lingüístico y la posibilidad de ser usado para estimar este constructo en diferentes escenarios.A presença de grandes bases de dados textuais permite a análise automatizada de construtos psicológicos. Para isso, foram desenvolvidos programas que categorizam palavras e identificam, entre outros, estilos cognitivos, linguísticos ou conteúdo emocional. Este trabalho é composto por dois estudos que apresentam evidências de validade de conteúdo e de validade externa de um dicionário destinado a avaliar a pró-socialidade, compatível com o software LIWC. O Estudo 1 partiu de um corpus de termos extraídos de fontes naturais e especializadas, avaliados por sete juízes, resultando em uma lista definitiva. No Estudo 2, utilizou-se um jogo de bens públicos no qual 160 participantes enfrentaram um dilema entre interesse próprio e bem-estar coletivo. Adicionalmente, os participantes responderam por escrito qual estratégia haviam utilizado no jogo e quais emoções experimentaram. Essas respostas foram analisadas com o dicionário construído no Estudo 1. Evidenciou-se que a pró-socialidade, medida pelo dicionário, relacionou-se positivamente com o comportamento cooperativo no jogo. Verificou-se também que o estilo cognitivo tipo II prediz o comportamento pró-social no jogo. Os dois estudos mostram a utilidade do dicionário para avaliar a pró-socialidade por meio da análise linguística e a possibilidade de ser usado para estimar esse construto em diferentes contextos.application/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlspaengUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3906https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3907https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3908Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCiencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-43561688-422110.22235/cp.v19i2reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguaypublic goods gamelanguage analysisLIWCcooperationjuego de bienes públicosanálisis lingüísticoLIWCcooperaciónjogo de bens públicosanálise linguísticaLIWCcooperaçãoDevelopment, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionaryDesarrollo, validación y evidencias experimentales de un diccionario de prosocialidadDesenvolvimento, validação e evidências experimentais de um dicionário de pró-socialidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/56962025-12-22 13:34:58.904metadata.onlyoai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/5696https://liberi.ucu.edu.uyInstitucionalhttps://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/Universidad privadahttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/server/oaifranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422026-06-23T06:47:44.201920LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguaytrue
score 15,300719