Contributions of Latin American Constitutional Justice to the Development of the Concept of Qualified Good Faith in Asset Forfeiture

The incorporation of new forms of non-punitive prosecution against economic crime entails not only the adoption of new procedures but also substantial modifications to traditional concepts in legal doctrine. One of these is good faith as invoked by third parties in asset forfeiture proceedings. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Urbina Mendoza, Emilio J.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Uruguay
Institución:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Repositorio:LIBERI
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7352
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/4693
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7352
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:constitution
property
qualified good faith
asset forfeiture
constitutional justice
constitución
propiedad
buena fe calificada
extinción de dominio
justicia constitucional
constituição
propriedade
boa-fé qualificada
extinção de domínio
justiça constitucional
Descripción
Sumario:The incorporation of new forms of non-punitive prosecution against economic crime entails not only the adoption of new procedures but also substantial modifications to traditional concepts in legal doctrine. One of these is good faith as invoked by third parties in asset forfeiture proceedings. The substantively constitutional nature of this legal institution, combined with its civil procedural dimension, has transformed the notion of good faith into what is known as qualified good faith. Over the past 30 years, Latin American constitutional courts—particularly the Colombian Constitutional Court—have shaped this distinctive concept, which differs from the generic understanding found in civil law.