Lockout: the counteraction vis-à-vis strikes. Brief analysis of legal provisions, scholars’ opinions and case-law on lockouts and strikes in the Uruguayan and foreign legal systems
The purpose of this paper is to explain and compare the lockout and the strike both in the Uruguayan legal system and in foreign jurisdictions. A brief historical background that contextualizes the lockout is included. Fundamental aspects regarding both are also analyzed, including their concepts, p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Uruguay |
| Institución: | Universidad de Montevideo |
| Repositorio: | REDUM |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/2033 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1214 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2033 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Lockout Cierre patronal Huelga típica Huelga atípica Temporary business closure by employers Typical strike Atypical strike Greve típica Greve atípica |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this paper is to explain and compare the lockout and the strike both in the Uruguayan legal system and in foreign jurisdictions. A brief historical background that contextualizes the lockout is included. Fundamental aspects regarding both are also analyzed, including their concepts, purpose, basis, and regulation in the Uruguayan legal system, modalities and effects, as well as their respective reception by legal scholars and courts. |
|---|