The Exonerating Effect of “Voluntary Desistance” of the Attempt: What Begins Badly, Ends Badly?

Voluntary desistance represents a complex issue in criminal dogmatics. In this context, the author argues that impunity for voluntary desistance, regulated in legal systems such as German, Spanish and Peruvian, lacks a solid foundation and instead generates dysfunctional consequences in any legal-cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Reaño Peschiera, José Leandro
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2005
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3103
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3103
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Voluntary Desistance
Attempt
Individual Autonomy
Impunity
Legal Reform
Criminal Law
Desistimiento Voluntario
Tentativa
Autonomía Individual
Impunidad
Reforma Legal
Derecho Penal
Descripción
Sumario:Voluntary desistance represents a complex issue in criminal dogmatics. In this context, the author argues that impunity for voluntary desistance, regulated in legal systems such as German, Spanish and Peruvian, lacks a solid foundation and instead generates dysfunctional consequences in any legal-criminal system that seeks to protect individual autonomy. Consequently, in a legal system where individual autonomy is a fundamental principle, the ability of an individual to avoid criminal liability simply by voluntarily desisting from a criminal act already initiated, without consideration of the risk created, is contrary to the logic of a criminal system that seeks to safeguard social security and order. It is therefore proposed that the rules be reformed in such a way that voluntary desistance does not automatically exempt from criminal liability. This would allow for a balance to be struck between criminal intent and the protection of the autonomy of others.