Desarrollo sostenible
In this article, different ideas of sustainable development are reviewed showing that they rest on ways of recognizing and assigning values. Despite its importance, this feature has not received the attention it deserves. The dominant valuation perspective is anthropocentric, which turns to behave a...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/203003 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/28454/27007 https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202402.001 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sustainable development Nature’s rights Economic growth Anthropocentrism Biocentrism Desarrollo sustentable Derechos de la naturaleza Crecimiento económico Antropocentrismo Biocentrismo https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.04.00 |
| Sumario: | In this article, different ideas of sustainable development are reviewed showing that they rest on ways of recognizing and assigning values. Despite its importance, this feature has not received the attention it deserves. The dominant valuation perspective is anthropocentric, which turns to behave as a conditionality that subordinates ecological imperatives and is functional to economic growth. Radical different perspectives are South American Andean-Amazonian alternatives based on a biocentric posture that recognizes intrinsic values in nature. Ecuador offers a case study of that perspective. It is argued that it represents a more powerful option because is an alternative beyond any variety of development. |
|---|