Garantismo y publicismo en el proceso civil: un enfoque analítico
This essay uses an analytic methodology in order to differentiate three approaches in the classical debate between activist (publicist) and adversarial (guarantee) models in the continental tradition of civil procedural law: the historical, philosophical and institutional approach. It is showed that...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/186419 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/24469/23238 https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/24469/23518 https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/24469/23519 https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202102.013 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Activist model Adversarial model Publicist model Guarantee model Constitutional model of procedure Constitutionalism Constitutional guarantee Publicismo Garantismo Modelo constitucional de proceso Constitucionalismo Garantía constitucional https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01 |
| Sumario: | This essay uses an analytic methodology in order to differentiate three approaches in the classical debate between activist (publicist) and adversarial (guarantee) models in the continental tradition of civil procedural law: the historical, philosophical and institutional approach. It is showed that each one of them has different premises of discussion and also allows to reach particular consequences. We defend a proposal to distinguish between the activist model and the adversarial model from a philosophical point of view by identifying the political theory premises that are in their foundations. In the activist model, the State’s function is to be a provider for the protection of fundamental rights and, therefore, the judicial process is conceived as an instrument of the jurisdiction in order to achieve its public goals. On the other hand, in the adversarial model, the State’s function assumes an abstentionist- type in order to preserve fundamental rights and hence, far from being and nstrument of judicial power, the judicial process is conceived as a citizen’s guarantee oriented to control that very power. |
|---|