Critical Evaluation of the Ultrsdonographic Biophysical Profile Score, Their Interpretation and Value. Hospital Guillermo Almenara, Lima-Perú
OBJECTIVES: To make a critical evaluation of the performance of Ultrasonographic Biophysical Profile (UBP) as a method for antepartum fetal evaluation; to define their main outcome measures as well as their interpretation, and propose a fetal well-being assessment algorithm which considers the score...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1999 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/4450 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/4450 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Utrasonography Fetus Prenatal Care Pregnancy Ultrasonografía Feto Atención Prenatal Embarazo |
| Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: To make a critical evaluation of the performance of Ultrasonographic Biophysical Profile (UBP) as a method for antepartum fetal evaluation; to define their main outcome measures as well as their interpretation, and propose a fetal well-being assessment algorithm which considers the score obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, prospective blind study. Since october, 1997 to september, 1998, 120 women with a gestational age ³28 weeks who required fetal well-being assessment to decide pregnancy interruption, at the High-Risk-Obstetrics Department, Hospital Guillermo Almenara, Lima. We evaluate the difficulties and benefits obtained with the ultrasonographic assessment of baseline fetal heart rate and heart reactivity; and the value of ultrasonographic qualitative assessment of amniotic fluid volume, placentary senescence and early placentary aging; and the value of establishing a cutpoint to define high risk pregnancies. RESULTS: Using this way, UBP showed an high sensitivity (87,5%), a good predictive value (63,6%) and an important decrease of false positive and false negative results (36,3% and 2,0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Used in conjunction with a fetal well-being assessment algorithm and with an individualized approach to each woman, UBP was efficient and effective. |
|---|