Lenguaje y realidad. Entre el monismo anómalo y la fórmula monismo = pluralismo
In this paper we propose to put in tension the approaches of Donald Davidson and Gilles Deleuze, belonging respectively to the analytical and continental philosophy. The aim is to remain in some of the tense areas arising around the question of to what extent language determines or is determined by...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/119270 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/estudiosdefilosofia/article/view/14595/15194 https://doi.org/10.18800/estudiosdefilosofia.201501.007 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Realidad Dualismo Monismo Anomalismo Pluralismo https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01 |
| Sumario: | In this paper we propose to put in tension the approaches of Donald Davidson and Gilles Deleuze, belonging respectively to the analytical and continental philosophy. The aim is to remain in some of the tense areas arising around the question of to what extent language determines or is determined by the real. We propose to consider how both authors jointly address the condition of social and creative language, and thus offer us two ways to address dualistic thinking –from Davidson’s anomalous monism and Deleuze’s monism as synonymous with pluralism– and to promote democratization of language use. Two lines which, in our perception, have not yet been sufficiently worked out regarding their deep relations. |
|---|