Alcance y límites del principio de jerarquía. Criterios para jerarquizar derechos, valores, bienes y otros elementos

The main aim of this research is to show the true dimension of the hierarchy principle, its scope and its limits. The goal is to overcome the normative vision of this principle, observing how it operates in other juridical elements, as charges, ends, values, goods, principles and rights. A philosoph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Riofrío, Juan Carlos
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/175820
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22110/21463
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22110/22328
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.007
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Principio de jerarquía, reglas de antinomias, jerarquía de normas, jerarquía de derechos, derechos humanos, jerarquía de principios, jerarquía de fines, jerarquía de valores
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Descripción
Sumario:The main aim of this research is to show the true dimension of the hierarchy principle, its scope and its limits. The goal is to overcome the normative vision of this principle, observing how it operates in other juridical elements, as charges, ends, values, goods, principles and rights. A philosophical, speculative and abstract method is used, endorsed with examples from the law of several nations and the international law. As the greatest debate in this field is the hierarchy of rights, viewed skeptically by a big part of the doctrine, this paper focuses on seeing how the hierarchy might work there. The analysis has a tripartite structure: a) exposition of the problem, b) exposition of notions, and c) resolution of the problem using the provided notions. In the first comprises the hierarchy principle, its positive and negative functions, and its conditions and limits, defining the possible hierarchical criteria. Finally, in the last sections, it’s checked whether the mentioned notions and criteria are applicable to the problem of rights and to other elements. After checking it the conclusions are presented.sections the arguments for and against the hierarchy of rights are exposed, andis shown where the problem of hierarchization lies. Then, it’s explained what