The plural suffix in spanish: Frequency and cognition
Studies on lexical frequency start from the so-called Zipf law (1949), according to which the most frequent words in languages tend to be the shortest in length (in terms of number of phonemes or syllables), which reveals an asymmetry as a prevalent property of language. Although such statistical re...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Academia Peruana de la Lengua |
| Repositorio: | Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.apl.org.pe:article/196 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.apl.org.pe/index.php/boletinapl/article/view/196 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | plural dominance reversible frequency semantic pole dominancia plural frecuencia reversible polo semántico |
| Resumo: | Studies on lexical frequency start from the so-called Zipf law (1949), according to which the most frequent words in languages tend to be the shortest in length (in terms of number of phonemes or syllables), which reveals an asymmetry as a prevalent property of language. Although such statistical regularity is usually analyzed from the records of verbal economy in articulatory gestures, the most recent perspective tries to elucidate the aspects related to lexical memory or cognition in general. In this context, we are interested in approaching the phenomenon of reversible frequency in plurals: while there is a general tendency for singular forms to be more frequent than plural forms, there is a small group of words in which plural forms exhibit greater frequency than the corresponding singular forms. Taking into account the overwhelming database known as the list of frequencies from the Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual (CREA) (Reference Corpus of Current Spanish), we have analyzed a sample of 40 words that flaunts the reversible frequency in a consistent manner. Our task is to try to formulate a plausible explanation in the promising framework of cognitive phonology in terms of a relationship between the phonological pole and the semantic pole, which is why we postulate a conceptual relationship between lexical access and word frequency. |
|---|