The «procedural autonomy» and the Constitutional Court: notes on an invented relationship
The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2007 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/102 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/102 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | procedural autonomy Constitutional Court procedural autonomía procesal Tribunal Constitucional proceso procedimiento |
| Sumario: | The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural autonomy». Finally, the author concludes that with his article he looks to reveal that the use of the Constitutional Procedural Autonomy has been the foundation for the harmful effects caused in various verdict of the Constitutional Court. |
|---|