Protection of the cultural elements and traditional expressions of indigenous and local communities: The prohibition to register a trademark of subparagraph g) of article 136 of the Decision 486
The present paper seeks to introduce a reflection about the protection of the cultural elements and traditional expressions of the indigenous and local communities, locating the pertinent law, the Andean Prejudicial Interpretation and its application on different cases.For that purpose, this investi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19882 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/19882 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Trademark Andean Community Decision 486 Cultural element Traditional expression Marca Comunidad Andina Decisión 486 Elemento cultural Expresión Tradicional |
| Sumario: | The present paper seeks to introduce a reflection about the protection of the cultural elements and traditional expressions of the indigenous and local communities, locating the pertinent law, the Andean Prejudicial Interpretation and its application on different cases.For that purpose, this investigation will focus on some cases from Peru and Colombia, under the ruling of Decision 486, identifying the way and content used by the competent administrative authority to decide on some trademark application, considering the prohibition contained in the paragraph g) of article 136 of the referred Decision. |
|---|